On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:03 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 15/04/2021 19:59, Ajit Khaparde:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 8:52 AM Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > > There are two types of flow actions:
> > > 1. the direct (normal) actions that could be created and stored
> > >    within a flow rule. Such action is tied to its flow rule and
> > >    cannot be reused.
> > > 2. the indirect action, in the past, named shared_action. It is
> > >    created from a direct actioni, like count or rss, and then used
> > >    in the flow rules with an object handle. The PMD will take care
> > >    of the retrieve from indirect action to the direct action
> > >    when it is referenced.
> [...]
> > > The RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is kept for now in order not to
> > > break the ABI. All the implementations are changed by using
> > > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT.
> >
> > When I read this somehow indirect did not feel right.
> > But I don't have a strong suggestion either.
> > Since it is a context of action or actions maybe we use action_context?
>
> This is an action which is not directly described in the flow rule,
> but in another object referenced by its handle.
> It creates a level of indirection in the rule description.
> I think the word "indirect" is accurate.
Ok. Let's go with that.
Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>

>
>
>