From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Received: from mail-oi1-f194.google.com (mail-oi1-f194.google.com
 [209.85.167.194]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBAD1B0FD
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  2 Oct 2018 18:45:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi1-f194.google.com with SMTP id 22-v6so1087745oiz.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=t5M6G1Hnz3jaSKlZ4OlqhYCgrGBeWS6mz83r+FQA2tc=;
 b=JBh5y1GjUTJvX6idVX08beupHU4garMqlSGE2RNJdIfbCNBERK1CIC+QSfStbt6e/E
 u2VZ43Xv0LHYvovNkU4eeYyKHsfG4FDKQuKahltiTc81vJN23SFG4zp2DJkxiqERtoM3
 9dRxlXw/jAD/rBQclGChAO0X39lFJInI2r2VY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=t5M6G1Hnz3jaSKlZ4OlqhYCgrGBeWS6mz83r+FQA2tc=;
 b=UPBj/s+sqaqa5mk1rjScYhkuZrtahqqoQTP1Z956M7uAWIB+HzboDnAse5m+pcjqRh
 EGPbGHamt2N8PaumaHz9sDqwpR+2PRpXdalm4m3ROlH3ky01wqtCVr9cLNvEw592cit8
 nh1RwEH9HMluOg3A7s6RVVmG4ndILMfdHhR9P25SChFOMipbeJpNlrfQyTn5rdXvqMUl
 tMw8id82NJnfNd8212RAffPL7rFMgPThoJWP3moZtEnvWIx5pyq0t6rbZye6Cj247huS
 PVkIvR8lMZIeWd1r9+oGAKhtm+mjOIcj1C7EI4smj08bqh7hjJAF4/ttQo2p//75pnDC
 iNUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohXuVg5lF6alv2RPUhxqR0FBR7TUinfMaaqyJDmQopTEIgtZutE
 qL9ANVZGQA6N3sJpaP1v6tt4Qeq+Zpb6aojRlOHVrw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61rBNmDpPq2Yz1G6l6/YdNw11U9mZ/plSuR46r6YMtYX8psLLLVkhU/z3cdmI82CVrw0H5nMX2UFt9QLRLlS80=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:b689:: with SMTP id
 g131-v6mr7134443oif.283.1538498708283; 
 Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <95301884-14c8-bbfd-ade9-ded04bdb6a95@intel.com>
 <20180929020006.71505-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
 <5cbb67b1-320d-f4ba-898d-7b7bf7921984@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <5cbb67b1-320d-f4ba-898d-7b7bf7921984@intel.com>
From: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:44:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CACZ4nhuww8hdeFiboKM8wcqFKf-Ypm1AXi-zfmjjce9_LoPL_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/15] bnxt patchset
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:45:09 -0000

>
>
> >   net/bnxt: update HWRM version
> >   net/bnxt: update HWRM version part 2
> >   net/bnxt: update HWRM version part 3
>
> Is there a logical to separation of part 1,2 & 3?
> Commit logs are empty and there is nothing distinctive from commits. If the
> separation is not logical but just physically split into 3 pieces I am for
> merging them back with the "Update the HWRM API to version 1.9.2.53"
> commit log.
>
Ferruh, It was a physical split into 3 patches.
So merging them into one is ok.

Thanks for checking.

Ajit


>
> Or if there is a logic please clarify it on patch subject and commit log.
>
> I will wait your answer before moving on.
>
> Thanks,
> ferruh
>