On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:21 PM Alexander Kozyrev wrote: > > > From: Stephen Hemminger on Monday, January 25, 2021 22:44 > > > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 03:38:24 +0000 > > Alexander Kozyrev wrote: > > > > > IPv6 DSCP field ID is missing from the original list of Field IDs > > > for MODIFY_FIELD action. Add it to support IPv6 header fully. > > > > > > Fixes: 73b68f4c54a ("ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action") > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev > > > --- > > > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h > > > index 46e8ee70ab..68c68cdd6c 100644 > > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h > > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h > > > @@ -2842,6 +2842,7 @@ enum rte_flow_field_id { > > > RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV4_TTL, > > > RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV4_SRC, > > > RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV4_DST, > > > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV6_DSCP, > > > RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV6_HOPLIMIT, > > > RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV6_SRC, > > > RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV6_DST, > > > > Adding field in middle of enum will break ABI. > > I added the rte_flow_field_id enum a week ago into 20.11-rc1. 21.02-rc1 > I believe it is not too late to make it right without breaking ABI, don't you think so?