From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chetan.bhasin017@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (mail-lj1-f177.google.com
 [209.85.208.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0462BA49
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  1 Nov 2018 05:53:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id f3-v6so16916720ljk.9
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 21:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=dHxSojS+F+3d4xDknBmZkeJIXLpG2KjjaX6IQ5RWWjg=;
 b=fYL33TTnzZKVqeyN6W58+5xntCeiC5yzP/i2j7LLzBZsI9LQuvrMutJzIVmjhs+I8h
 ijQ8q7uj2V2iQ6HwAN+CHlhm8ugWH1EpaMKA7k4L8pImXKuHyone+XsUg8cYoo69UMc0
 Y6S212mxTeic0K+r7yGddaGZZjodTbp3h35f364Xgr10qp+/9UaNbxuZn2jYSrgFcpHU
 57GtpsAWXljH7BGsHPkZfjy67WQVqRWbMZaX30QL5hhC8Cmup4mHkxljPZZ+WrcKWinQ
 D4/5Bu5bPNZt89zwBbv2zfZACUt6zbs6hSSVMEjUTM/nOljxYxRStt7q2Y/U1n3Pytqg
 kg5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=dHxSojS+F+3d4xDknBmZkeJIXLpG2KjjaX6IQ5RWWjg=;
 b=El7dUf4qshBpVwyZka3aFi4qCiCdsL2+0v7yu4kVU9SThF2PEQ9gmghMXWeop9XGA9
 vF+V21glRbNZLW4vet0sDZFAPmBikR9mKYdKGgPsO12/tx5437ZP3I6jWlDIlkSJsxQJ
 ktZKuqgRbbtUVpRBHBvyl9+hWbDJyrRG17i//AyiTaW9m+OXC+acNTNokIBY5sG5wsQq
 8QVveq+jq7KTSJ9E+weEciXirqIYar9eDYQvveOV4TSzvpBJCk4xlhRHs0FlJgg6BQzn
 1Slt7Pg+3oqrOZI9C1jFE2ciM0ABlvf21VuaI7ce1oMWxdlsVuif12bld4i3ETFWVUYQ
 d5cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gI/alGQo1zBu3STg6tTz2///MjPRB9eUt7d70kvD++UaXPibceS
 nVWBvrOI6rfw16KZ6cYcIXWOiY5tRfe58ZDpaCvCNiGD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fJpVyt56IkD3Q8LSCnkVLdyUdzH2c7XSs2blwsggTg7zKrzm6WD5nJy1yk+vDdXCo+4SplaDZpWpp6GZ0NmG8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:96c6:: with SMTP id d6-v6mr4029937ljj.35.1541048036218; 
 Wed, 31 Oct 2018 21:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: chetan bhasin <chetan.bhasin017@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:23:44 +0530
Message-ID: <CACZZ+Y4utf9e8k3vjPWKiE_JWkt2M+2fWj0Q9OXDmx=L8eAP5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Issue with DPDK bonding with Mellanox
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 04:53:57 -0000

Hi,

We are using Dpdk 17.11.4 and facing issue in bringing setup with bonding
although without bonding it is working fine.

Your help is much appreciated!

*Command used *

--vdev eth_bond0,mode=1,slave=0000:37:00.0,slave=0000:37:00.1

Error Logs
=============

Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - net_mlx5: cannot access device, is mlx5_ib loaded?

Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - EAL: Requested device 0000:37:00.1 cannot be used

Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - PMD: bond_ethdev_parse_slave_port_kvarg(166) -
Invalid slave port value (0000:37:00.1) specified

Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - EAL: Failed to parse slave ports for bonded device
eth_bond0

Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - vdev_probe(): failed to initialize eth_bond0
device


Thanks,
Chetan Bhasin