* [dpdk-dev] Regarding ENIC driver dpdk 17.11.4 vs dpdk 19.05
@ 2020-03-11 11:36 chetan bhasin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: chetan bhasin @ 2020-03-11 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi,
We are using VPP , which internally using dpdk.
*With vpp 18.01(dpdk 17.11.4)* : Whenever we set MTU of interface as 1500 ,
we can get 1500 size of untagged and tagged packet.
*With vpp 19.0.5* (dpdk 19.05) : Whenever we set mtu as 1500 , we have seen
issue with vlan packets, those are not even enter dpdk-input node of vpp.
As per code
difference which is leading to the above issue
1.
Dpdk 17.11.4 (device_info->max_rx_pktlen = enic->max_mtu + ETHER_HDR_LEN
+ 4)
2.
Dpdk 19.05 (enic->max_mtu + ETHER_HDR_LEN;) --------> *+ 4 is not there*
So why we have changed this logic in later dpdk version?
Thanks,
Chetan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-03-11 11:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-11 11:36 [dpdk-dev] Regarding ENIC driver dpdk 17.11.4 vs dpdk 19.05 chetan bhasin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).