From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chetan.bhasin017@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com (mail-lj1-f170.google.com
 [209.85.208.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1105F2E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  2 Nov 2018 06:16:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id s15-v6so665694lji.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=x3FOAKnA/rQRUGif9MC8PQpiXzGYH5gUNAvUkRfV+P0=;
 b=CqzKNQ/zV+CkoELiT159Zz5UHWbF/T7McCMxnhxfu8lm1uaOnPZjwldIWvCqt9Xzd/
 x1nMURCWiQ/ONTtuvdoqquzORRTuu57nNMR99e22iV8SeZXcqaxXhJoJLv9U0RjgsoaS
 yo4qnMjbBUjaNY4NLs0UipTBTEdsJkftoGvi8YXHRGePt9+uAL7Y9/gRj7iUjM+T5ggX
 NNdAuS37BtoZtmRMujJ/DjZcb5YybXrqlfxqAmQl2ThD554gGEta+u0A+REPf8KHb792
 qawpt6xRBXbpeOPtSpIeCAIvDiOUII9KcmScpUwiYhemkeucltx9QLQ8Z3szdiu0d3Gw
 NM0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=x3FOAKnA/rQRUGif9MC8PQpiXzGYH5gUNAvUkRfV+P0=;
 b=LTE+BWSKEY2uvKKPlqeb9W8fGp5s3/eiMsHSLC7yayFD9shElDjk+rFoACRDs6kUfv
 vTKQi377s6SgbC/WNoXIABdXDnOZykCX3sAg+36ihu1Eo/4mNZolVQti3siiRyYeQJqL
 36LheFPUDrT2b4dd+y1K5JUCenP/U/sQp0clSVlSe7ZGZ1aA5Wk+XP7Lmz0rTce+QMqF
 4WqYiK4MreZtlrZ48+rZR8eKPN64p98nRHHtwDvMb7TAS8Kg0of/q4hVdZXvGTTDmke8
 YhqfQrFfvH/uH2pHw6BbuzSVWt/obqZ0G5bK328/turYau5w41YlqZfOWwWzlwkMFzaU
 qUsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIplvMtIYHvoBlJclUalAZugJNm3LTyZseb1LH4ivyekiIKEkyq
 R5ABrdUviS8R9XwPkau6yQceQuRh0yB27X7e5j4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cqMC8DB4kB3tPDYrNjrjklD4m4eITyI+XM8zrSPAnb2J7zW4iG9DQkbW8YQrIib+RpizFkHa8P+y/slqkcRYQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:81d3:: with SMTP id
 s19-v6mr5820624ljg.138.1541135769021; 
 Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACZZ+Y4utf9e8k3vjPWKiE_JWkt2M+2fWj0Q9OXDmx=L8eAP5g@mail.gmail.com>
 <AM0PR0502MB4019ADDF986A2BF457D1C3A3D2CE0@AM0PR0502MB4019.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR0502MB4019ADDF986A2BF457D1C3A3D2CE0@AM0PR0502MB4019.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: chetan bhasin <chetan.bhasin017@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:45:56 +0530
Message-ID: <CACZZ+Y70ECrtnuiYFZKKxMxmPGBRKWTNsH9Z6GZcF=AF5wy1xg@mail.gmail.com>
To: matan@mellanox.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with DPDK bonding with Mellanox
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 05:16:09 -0000

Hi Matan,

Thanks for your reply.

I have not removed Mellanox interfaces those were still up in linux domain .

Thanks,
Chetan Bhasin

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:20 PM Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com> wrote:

> Hi Chetan
>
> From:  chetan bhasin
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are using Dpdk 17.11.4 and facing issue in bringing setup with bonding
> > although without bonding it is working fine.
> >
> > Your help is much appreciated!
> >
> > *Command used *
> >
> > --vdev eth_bond0,mode=1,slave=0000:37:00.0,slave=0000:37:00.1
> >
> > Error Logs
> > =============
> >
> > Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - net_mlx5: cannot access device, is mlx5_ib
> loaded?
> >
> > Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - EAL: Requested device 0000:37:00.1 cannot be
> used
> >
> > Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - PMD: bond_ethdev_parse_slave_port_kvarg(166) -
> > Invalid slave port value (0000:37:00.1) specified
> >
> > Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - EAL: Failed to parse slave ports for bonded
> device
> > eth_bond0
> >
> > Oct 31 13:13:07 - INFO - vdev_probe(): failed to initialize eth_bond0
> device
>
>
> Did you remove the corresponding bonding interface from the kernel?
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chetan Bhasin
>