From: Pavel Boldin <pboldin@mirantis.com>
To: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: Fix `struct file' leakage in `eventfd_link'
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:08:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACf4_B8g6cuxeUvY6YkFzvb7DStL+6NTz_uwizGKBDb0+LPayw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F3F59D7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Xie, Huawei <huawei.xie@intel.com> wrote:
> On 3/24/2015 7:10 PM, Pavel Boldin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Xie, Huawei <huawei.xie@intel.com<mailto:
> huawei.xie@intel.com>> wrote:
> On 3/23/2015 8:54 PM, Pavel Boldin wrote:
> > Due to increased `struct file's reference counter subsequent call
> > to `filp_close' does not free the `struct file'. Prepend `fput' call
> > to decrease the reference counter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Boldin <pboldin@mirantis.com<mailto:
> pboldin@mirantis.com>>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_vhost/eventfd_link/eventfd_link.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/eventfd_link/eventfd_link.c
> b/lib/librte_vhost/eventfd_link/eventfd_link.c
> > index 7755dd6..62c45c8 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/eventfd_link/eventfd_link.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/eventfd_link/eventfd_link.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ eventfd_link_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int
> ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> > * Release the existing eventfd in the source process
> > */
> > spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> > + fput(file);
> > filp_close(file, files);
> > fdt = files_fdtable(files);
> > fdt->fd[eventfd_copy.source_fd] = NULL;
> Acked-by Huawei Xie <huawei.xie@intel.com<mailto:huawei.xie@intel.com>>
>
> In future, we should remove the allocation of src eventfd, allocate a
> free fd from kernel, and install it with target fd.
>
> Well, I don't think this is correct, because this will put too much job
> for the kernel module making it a combiner.
>
> At the moment I propose to accept module refactoring patch to the upstream.
>
> After that the module can be reworked along with the application code. The
> reason is I can't work on DPDK since I have no hardware to test application
> at so I can't help with patch that touches application code.
>
> Pavel
> Pavel:
> I am not asking to do it right now but in future, and i agree we accept
> the refactoring patch now, so i ack the patch.
>
Huawei, this is the refactoring patch [1]. This patch is merely a bugfix.
[1] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4113/
> Huawei
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-24 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 12:53 Pavel Boldin
2015-03-23 14:21 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-03-23 14:36 ` Pavel Boldin
2015-03-23 14:41 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-03-23 14:51 ` Pavel Boldin
2015-03-23 15:16 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-03-23 15:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-23 15:27 ` Pavel Boldin
2015-03-23 15:36 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-03-23 15:44 ` Pavel Boldin
2015-03-24 6:28 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-03-24 11:10 ` Pavel Boldin
2015-03-24 16:20 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-03-24 20:08 ` Pavel Boldin [this message]
2015-03-26 7:53 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-03-27 11:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-26 7:56 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-03-26 15:17 ` Pavel Boldin
2015-03-27 11:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-27 12:36 ` Pavel Boldin
2015-03-27 13:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-26 15:20 ` Xie, Huawei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACf4_B8g6cuxeUvY6YkFzvb7DStL+6NTz_uwizGKBDb0+LPayw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pboldin@mirantis.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).