DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bharath paulraj <bharathpaul@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:30:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACfjA+k3e4hAi_ZEAHEYWZt+i=yia1gmXj0cB67w6Pcn8evD1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi Team,

    We are facing an issue when we are trying to implement Layer 2 bridging
functionality over the Virtual function.

*Requirement:*
    We need to create four VMs and each VM should run in promiscuous mode
for a specific VLAN, so that it can receive packets for that VLAN and all
the unicast MAC address irrespective of its (VF) mac address. In other
words, the packet classification should be based on VLAN only. Each VM has
to use SRIOV enabled with VF interface (NIC Controller used here is Intel
82599)

*Problem Description:*
    Facing issues while enabling promiscuous mode in virtual function. We
have seen many mail threads about promiscuous mode not working on VF.

*Questions:*
    1) Is it possible to enable promiscuous mode on virtual function?
    2) Is the above supported for 82599 controller? If it is supported in
the NIC, please provide the steps to enable.
    3) If it is enabled, then VLAN should be the only classifier to
determine the packets fate to reach the VM. Is it possible to do the
classification based on the VLAN alone?

Thanks,
Bharath Paulraj

             reply	other threads:[~2016-03-15  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-15  9:00 bharath paulraj [this message]
2016-03-16  0:45 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-03-16 15:29   ` bharath paulraj
2016-03-16 15:54     ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-03-16 16:04     ` Zhang, Helin
2016-03-16 16:10       ` Rose, Gregory V
2016-03-17  6:42         ` bharath paulraj
2016-03-22  6:39           ` Qiu, Michael
2016-03-22  7:33             ` bharath paulraj
2016-03-31 10:43               ` bharath paulraj
2016-04-07 10:39                 ` bharath paulraj
     [not found]                   ` <C5551D9AAB213A418B7FD5E4A6F30A0789F7706A@ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com>
2016-04-08 21:06                     ` Rose, Gregory V
2016-04-12  5:51                       ` bharath paulraj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACfjA+k3e4hAi_ZEAHEYWZt+i=yia1gmXj0cB67w6Pcn8evD1g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=bharathpaul@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).