DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cheng Kevin <k5896246@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK testpmd, Virtual Disk IO limitation
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:47:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACnuE8FQ9k4nfy3UjLR8pUet+zUeSAPbp8MoJfQWT+-L2tMD4g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150325173248.GA2824@bricha3-MOBL3>

Hi Mr.Bruce Richardson

    I expect the testpmd is able to store the payload of the coming packets
and that's all.
    However, as you can see, my program hits the bottlenecks.
    The performance is unable to reach 800mbps anymore.

    My end-goal is simple, finding a way to store the payload without
decreasing the speed of packet forwarding.

Thanks
Kevin



2015-03-26 1:32 GMT+08:00 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>:

> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:20:42AM +0800, Cheng Kevin wrote:
> > Mr. Bruce Richardson
> >
> > Yes, you are right. This really bother me.
> >
> > Is there any way to get rid of system call? Maybe some DPDK threading
> API?
> > Maybe i should use a extra nic card for posting the data out through
> > internet, instead of writing on the disk - ex. fwrite.
> >
> > Or you have some better advises??
> >
> > Thanks
> > Kevin
> >
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> what is your end-goal that you are trying to get to?
>
> /Bruce
>
> >
> > 2015-03-25 23:01 GMT+08:00 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com
> >:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:06:48PM +0800, Cheng Kevin wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >    I am a beginner of DPDK. Recently, i am interest in DPDK vHost
> app -
> > > > testpmd.
> > > >
> > > >    And i have been tracing on testpmd.c and iofwd.c for a while.
> > > >
> > > >    Also add some code inside iofwd.c for storing the payload of
> packets.
> > > >
> > > >    Everything goes fine, and the performance is great as expected.
> > > >
> > > >    But when i use fwrite to store the payload into a file,
> > > >
> > > >    the performance decrease from 800mbps to 3mbps (input stream is 1
> > > Gbps).
> > > >
> > > >    Is is caused by the limitation of Virtual Disk IO? How can i
> solve it?
> > > >
> > > >    I have tried to search the answer, some people say "pthread" might
> > > solve
> > > > the problem.
> > > >
> > > >    Can someone give me some hint, i really appreciate for your help.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best Regard,
> > > >
> > > > Kevin Cheng
> > >
> > > Two general issues you will hit writing to disk:
> > > 1) IO, including disk IO, is slow
> > > 2) System calls are slow.
> > >
> > > You are probably hitting both bottlenecks.
> > >
> > > /Bruce
> > >
>

      reply	other threads:[~2015-03-25 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-25 14:06 Cheng Kevin
2015-03-25 15:01 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-25 16:20   ` Cheng Kevin
2015-03-25 17:32     ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-25 23:47       ` Cheng Kevin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACnuE8FQ9k4nfy3UjLR8pUet+zUeSAPbp8MoJfQWT+-L2tMD4g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=k5896246@gmail.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).