From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ve0-f194.google.com (mail-ve0-f194.google.com [209.85.128.194]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3EFB0BE for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:49:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ve0-f194.google.com with SMTP id jz11so1080421veb.5 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:49:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lYKhiO9OkNYHOKoX7UGjTWY1xQyoIMHWc8IpG4HJ290=; b=QPQyc7ccw5FYqj4fqe2zi0kM/uC0aldOz+1k1qAt2YcH/UZpnFCmjpCENjPIe+HrTm qaZn7TUX2O6CGV66QePK7TO8vPe6c/ic1HH2pvjzjyhJQ2tDpqSyeY5whH/qH0qiZu06 +OcuRlq2FygJiyUmPATwkjlNw5CUlnr4YdACjofUDUsAyWX6toUyrcL2PQ3wZvZROOVK Io1HuGPFMeGp0JlhPc3gu6jZcHv6/nc0RaicT0FcCqUmbDG2D7vnsqj+a/HdyLqmEV8L wfgF2YTxZr4barPo4EroPwIbeVCBniUXWByUHqk55JYCblBmzjCqnB6J913xasEh/riC AuJg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.160.10 with SMTP id xg10mr2787812veb.0.1402404582026; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.21.202 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:49:41 +0300 Message-ID: From: Uri Sidler To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] using rte_malloc() in a secondary process. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:49:28 -0000 Hi, I have 2 processes without fork(). can the secondary process use rte_malloc()? is there a limitation for using rte_malloc on a secondary process? do I have to allocate a memzone in order to use the rte_malloc()? Thanks.