From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <uri.sidler@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ve0-f195.google.com (mail-ve0-f195.google.com
 [209.85.128.195]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0ED594F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:01:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f195.google.com with SMTP id oz11so674308veb.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=Vauqe/Fu3c1fI0p7rhOjSCnXwDExZ9l5vCDztVVD304=;
 b=SSv5ZGiqJeA34xYP0rlpUfQg+eyX31tdRG90uefl1ExFPYg0gjSMCKw7oEjYyNxErT
 ZoUQvUFlisCQY3/uYksX4ScWOo2Oxvd5WHIezgWwopfunZCj5MpzahJ4fk6D4oBQeL49
 DFgrAddheFsSDDy1J8ClqShy0L37hLFIPOUMQdGgi+fhsu38tKAfYxWg8Uf97QbRE7Xe
 Srrf/Q/ZoFfe9pyQ8qAwJ1/cN/OGIM334SsqZ3DWcLmQgE/vbDHM2daNVLmgWSgJvKO5
 WGW73/CqP/P0tQSvlWIPwU1LWktt3s8XGKXt2gwj8Ryh6ZbSRv/fY+ESKILbnpAhQcPQ
 QjxA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.230.34 with SMTP id sv2mr6856210vdc.57.1402387323218;
 Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.221.21.202 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:02:03 +0300
Message-ID: <CACxZdGrb=Tq3XyJkbnXd7WCLZOYJYwGtjFBT=9-89rQVd-WOeQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Uri Sidler <uri.sidler@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] using hash table in a MP environment
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:01:49 -0000

Hi,
I am currently using a hash table in a multi-process environment.
the master process creates the hash table which is later used by other
secondary processes.
but the secondary processes fail to use the hash table since the hash
function address actually points to a different fucntion. (this makes sense
since the address of the hash function is in fact different per process).
How can I solve this issue?

Thanks,
Shirley.