From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE722BD1 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 12:09:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m72so21716369wmc.1 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 04:09:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NPsgPIiHmSou8aaMrgQPVAhmhpjPu8m7swRcjL1yeXQ=; b=0n91iIh/UPFdBeSj+t8kAjWPyBAkFeXNbQvbsHu6TRZRxj6W6Hbndqe2Pj1E1NROQB +5haEAYWX032gFAgGU2uc/B214DlafNiiBPcmzJhi6zMV9EAMuLDLWm0X3MYazf9O89T Mfumk7hc9VCHnMfYbph6HbtMaZ+Bi0u+RXHJASd+DFAX6rhH74trh9O77YfriUKGxsoO 4RJePT2ag5oh0Xs9Viy31CEISPgrfvVSKWwndNFhb2dLpoJk8hfA+XaMOhFMGxmavqhG 3hFH8mCA7pR2CoRzV4ua9HzQLgngoZ3ywO332nui8G0xQ10XYWRIJr3V3E63WeK0D43X npDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NPsgPIiHmSou8aaMrgQPVAhmhpjPu8m7swRcjL1yeXQ=; b=hZsJAjGJrt9OylnW3n82m5P/XknYQIOqclgfLPZTIemZIfisu+HDArJCspaLJS8mJw FuZXKEXXq/qJFsNQn7wUU4/J4WCeDIalWypjUvJMHtfef+nKXLkbgFZFeWmcvFjCezex aODIfNklA8ggPJ7NDv0/Z2ntqol0TK/z3v6uR9s208BCq9uVLcNfkAp0LTJHD9eorDgy PvyOxSBfK1Gb81byd1az5uEjgHm+bapm3qJ8in8/ovEj4ZfrPlh/Ui2fB0JnxFjBzluo /RG8rDp8ilfxH5q6tBP0gCf2vza/ukL1ec5C0jsmB2S3h46rozkmyATHq1Ta/A44GAuH HPTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWFDiyIXobx3ZBasFoJAvVBTYhI2yWbxP4xGus7jnfJAiTElYwq pcKX05bCA/4eXg9PaMwsuWhrbfdCR94z7lHWfU7n6Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Q3W8TJa6Sy2pQXyBXm5ZrutzdKoG4Qi2TlArXSvOeZNtzwbzKqC/OTBv9xL3jw+n03R/jKZIWWa6MhMQjDmwA= X-Received: by 10.80.215.22 with SMTP id t22mr2429470edi.45.1509448173692; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 04:09:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.176.132 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 04:09:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3652280.9o21atcoxD@xps> From: Alejandro Lucero Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:09:33 +0000 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Gaetan Rivet , dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] Remove RTE_ETH_DEV_DETACHABLE X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:09:34 -0000 I'm afraid the patch introduced a problem for the NFP PMD. I have submitted a patch fixing it: "net/nfp: avoid unplug if multiport" Thanks On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Alejandro Lucero < alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > i have been on PTO since the 19th of October. > > I will test this patch asap, but I'm aware this has already been accepted. > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Ferruh Yigit > wrote: > >> On 10/24/2017 5:35 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> > 24/10/2017 12:35, Gaetan Rivet: >> >> Gaetan Rivet (6): >> >> ethdev: do not rely on detachable flag in detach >> >> ethdev: remove detachable device flag >> >> pci: propagate PMD removal error value for unplug >> >> doc: follow detachable flag disappearance >> >> doc: update detachable flag deprecation notice >> >> doc: note ether API change for detachable flag >> >> > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon >> >> Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. >> >> (doc patches squashed into patch 2/6) >> > >