From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF9512A8 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:44:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2015 03:44:25 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,459,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="666924529" Received: from pgsmsx103.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.82]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2015 03:44:23 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.110.14) by PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 19:44:23 +0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.231]) by SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.192]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 19:44:15 +0800 From: "Zhu, Heqing" To: Jim Hao Chen , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: which 40G card support DPDK or DPDK 2.0 Thread-Index: AQHQN1BLvldDA8kDQEOf4v6fqVu2bZzPJsqg Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:44:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1422048308631.78113@northwestern.edu> In-Reply-To: <1422048308631.78113@northwestern.edu> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] which 40G card support DPDK or DPDK 2.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:44:27 -0000 http://www.dpdk.org/doc/nics=20 i40e (X710, XL710) can support Intel 40G Ethernet cards - Source code is pa= rt of DPDK today. =20 http://www.dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/=20 -----Original Message----- From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jim Hao Chen Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 2:25 PM To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] which 40G card support DPDK or DPDK 2.0 Hello: I am sorry if this question has been asked before, or this is not right= list to ask, I searched the list archive, did not see any answer. Any one can share information about which Mellanox 40G NIC on the mark = can/will support DPDK or DPDK 2.0? The DPDK supported NIC page only list ml= x4 (ConnectX-3, ConnectX-3 Pro)? we are in the process to acquire hardware to start DPDK related project= s. Thanks Jim Chen iCAIR/Northwestern University