From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA94C4AC for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:34:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igrv9 with SMTP id v9so37414775igr.1 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 03:34:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ok7qOmqG5s+VWwvAJVoJxm51202qV3KTy2nC/++ec0A=; b=l/5ux1i9UHI5X2lfBMCQhSxo/T1yjb/lqBcYtgSZyq4/cj3UHg4U/1ttgqJG+yfIe1 2aF4jNhs0yHLx9+uor1rLlFs3OfeVcsG0E5n1yvaj4f/0UMXHj8+VlxpJPuC3oRqpZ70 sMOtq9Wa6Vgsp1wuCdtey4OzGVIf4mRa6/iqXEi6a8bXiN7yetGTPgDxp7f1311hYMpV HtI55FdKegT0DJawTfzELi3a7zJQb3FjxWYKxwS+/3v/LjTWvGCrNLzn7gxXvJqIbD2T MxgWgDe9MFZ1X1DhGhPX/vslLXZBi3TNEk6Hi4TQgxuCu3H+HgEIH6wZPDY9BeEppBFd eYJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.164.66 with SMTP id mr2mr17732845icc.85.1435574074290; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 03:34:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.156.229 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 03:34:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:04:34 +0530 Message-ID: From: Abhishek Verma To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV and DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:34:35 -0000 Hi, Does it make sense to test DPDK without the underlying hypervisor supporting SR-IOV? I am trying to understand DPDK by trying it out on a VM running on Virtual Box. My intent is to see packets arriving on my virtual eth ports directly into the user space, completely bypassing the guest kernel. The expectation is that if this works, then once i move to an environment which supports SR-IOV then i will get full bang for my buck. Is my understanding correct here? Thanks, Abhishek