From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-f54.google.com (mail-vk0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B336CB6 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:33:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-vk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e185so135157305vkb.1 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 06:33:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infiniteio-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=9EUpxNUrqQNusj3Qsqn3H6pNQ0Acyrw7Z0PwiW3OMMQ=; b=emg8HgwiOTMToKZIN1N4F8EE4bDTT4vuZEslJiNj9kHKkNfMU7AAzuPRbK+ftrU303 QgUwsYKWPKgp3KtJo3PDzpaRbK3oMtVkDwjMkCWikYRqx8MWtJos4yjNHeEozCpzbI1H Lf5gQlnEURliy8Iso9OhoQvuBV++921u2hSDdAdMd7kC2nEnmb5x+UClvlKqwEZa8kLG SN3UL4+gCWCahdf+6+bjWRH3PrYKGpb6JxuG9VFyYgwfNAOPHUQxxgew16Ltg50lNyrZ 8vYGLBSxB27zruCFEs/cDdXcrtRIjq5Yhfo3PEFX+vpWh5yYTjXZqVfqWC57PtrlolS2 07Zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=9EUpxNUrqQNusj3Qsqn3H6pNQ0Acyrw7Z0PwiW3OMMQ=; b=QehGegKyO0xXYF3uq0hZobLj3w0VigtqHgQKNPMDz5/npNEOxDJLzD/q8ZzOjh2Poh Q2M0UqJVK2cwsOhMMa4nI/tIO6O9NGI+WBjl64+W/ThSiVFsu7XOKt2JPlE82NYVkw/0 SF9tUB1Vjk9ZY0FX3XCGauaJpv/pTN2DSd7lbyl/s8+B6ly3yh6cjJsL7rhCW8aCaAR2 TYwlClIMqAFH15hSASU5U3/SHlv361jM3By0BD9R+RCi4+urgFvz+FCveeXR4BhGj3aH +lyyD/Rl0lsnnzS9yUgNF4iy3F47tAfM9QpIkVDpL3fBUX2N9sPTh4b9ZIrhaVemsu5p Aj/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIYef4t3cRXWhHZoK6Bcagwug65W9iOBT3g2UUVzrJrzommSXmQlRzgdY31ZPDQl7a0mLIWDVz+O83Nkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.166.208 with SMTP id p199mr11668677vke.122.1456756405883; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 06:33:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.103.96.1 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 06:33:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1945473.Tiatd2m80T@xps13> References: <1453911849-16562-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <56D420E5.9010802@intel.com> <56D42462.3020905@scylladb.com> <1945473.Tiatd2m80T@xps13> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 08:33:25 -0600 Message-ID: From: Jay Rolette To: Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: DPDK , Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:33:26 -0000 On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > I totally agree with Avi's comments. > This topic is really important for the future of DPDK. > So I think we must give some time to continue the discussion > and have netdev involved in the choices done. > As a consequence, these series should not be merged in the release 16.04. > Thanks for continuing the work. > I know you guys are very interested in getting rid of the out-of-tree drivers, but please do not block incremental improvements to DPDK in the meantime. Ferruh's patch improves the usability of KNI. Don't throw out good and useful enhancements just because it isn't where you want to be in the end. I'd like to see these be merged. Jay