From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rolette@infiniteio.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com
 [209.85.212.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED035A43
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  9 Apr 2015 18:31:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so98976122wiz.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=y9cgf+9FDbV6dHRX36vn+VCBH9ilnLUm6Up8gUzuUoc=;
 b=MYjJrnIkG//76dEbN5aNBFJ/88YA8d3C2LuF/d5LOSmBXqZ238oTe4yegDikIxzf41
 6c7ugIjPAs5S0pD/4wFWk7oKjUShtTdVXDfc6lVEXKNrB+nYGi/apTDzpOO7ZBtzpgbX
 sgkYcJjPEDVi9oLFRgU3oy2IiWX2gIlEjv8EcsqdU5mLMUkmvYDpF0wYSr5br+tdPSmR
 bHi+jBheIVTvQOWLP1lg9Fjnc3cTPjjc2qZdHG33ZLZQrG27aul+DloATiKpZsvgxuvZ
 VpAw221argFu89V7HuWOE6h2tcspVu8FKS3RjNzjGcLvf1bfHmrnu6o00CW4FEYrEvhF
 nWvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmRfnpfn6IqCdE2Ix8j2tqCdHzw/FtWAY47iaDTNdz56+IDd0P8w6NCgnnSsALYDYW0mWqM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.109.169 with SMTP id ht9mr7741166wib.86.1428597099750;
 Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.153.130 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 09:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150408153802.2bc59227@urahara>
References: <3571725.20GtF5MAnU@xps13>
 <0C5AFCA4B3408848ADF2A3073F7D8CC86D58F9C2@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20150408114339.GA22959@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
 <0C5AFCA4B3408848ADF2A3073F7D8CC86D58FB64@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20150408131105.GD22959@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
 <0C5AFCA4B3408848ADF2A3073F7D8CC86D58FDBF@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <0FBA33A7-A21E-426F-B44E-32E86F2B23DB@infiniteio.com>
 <20150408153802.2bc59227@urahara>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:31:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CADNuJVp+L2OJAswQTJ74qGcDk_ZhyWiaznj0=wQmh7bQCJaAVg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jay Rolette <rolette@infiniteio.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] tools brainstorming
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 16:31:40 -0000

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Stephen Hemminger <
stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:29:54 -0600
> Jay Rolette <rolette@infiniteio.com> wrote:
>
> > "C comments" includes //, right? It's been part of the C standard for a
> long time now...
>
> Yes but.
> I like to use checkpatch and checkpatch enforces kernel style which does
> not allow // for
> comments.
>

Fork checkpatch and disable that bit? DPDK isn't the kernel, so no
requirement to follow all of its rules