From: Jay Rolette <rolette@infiniteio.com>
To: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] librte_reorder: new reorder library
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 14:01:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADNuJVpwfiC2x3joDnkgUX=fpEMe2MAS46ozkvojsaKy0=UGZA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831FE21954@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Reshma,
A few comments and questions about your design...
1) How do you envision the reorder library to be used? Based on the
description, it seems like the expectation is that packet order would be
maintained at either the interface/port level or maybe at the RX queue
level. Is that right or am I reading too much between the lines?
For my purposes (and for network security products I've developed in the
past), I mostly don't care about box or port-level order. The most
important thing is to maintain packet order within a flow. Relative order
from packets in different flows doesn't matter. If there is a way I can
process packets in parallel and transmit out-of-order transmission *within
the flow*, that's very useful. Architecturally, it helps avoid hot-spotting
in my packet processing pipeline and wasting cycles when load-balancing
isn't perfect (and it never is).
2) If the reorder library is "flow aware", then give me flexibility on
deciding what a flow is. Let me define pseudo-flows even if the protocol
itself isn't connection oriented (ie., frequently useful to treat UDP
5-tuples as a flow). I may want to include tunnels/VLANs/etc. as part of my
"flow" definition. I may need to include the physical port as part of the
flow definition.
Ideally, the library includes the common cases and gives me the option to
register a callback function for doing whatever sort of "flows" I require
for my app.
3) Is there a way to apply the reorder library to some packets and not
others? I might want to use for TCP and UDP, but not care about order for
other IP traffic (for example).
4) How are you dealing with internal congestion? If I drop a packet
somewhere in my processing pipeline, how does the TX side of the reorder
queue/buffer deal with the missing sequence number? Is there some sort of
timeout mechanism so that it will only wait for X microseconds for a
missing sequence number?
Need the ability to bound how long packets are held up in the reorder
engine before they are released.
Assuming you address this, the reorder engine will also need to deal with
slow packets that show up after "later" packets were transmitted.
Regards,
Jay
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am planning to implement packet reorder library. Details are as below,
> please go through them and provide the comments.
>
> Requirement:
> To reorder out of ordered packets that are received from
> different cores.
>
> Usage:
> To be used along with distributor library. Next version of distributor are
> planned to distribute incoming packets to all worker cores irrespective of
> the flow type.
> In this case to ensure in order delivery of the packets at output side
> reorder library will used by the tx end.
>
> Assumption:
> All input packets will be marked with sequence number in seqn field of
> mbuf, this will be the reference for reordering at the tx end.
> Sequence number will be of type uint32_t. New sequence number field seqn
> will be added to mbuf structure.
>
> Design:
> a)There will be reorder buffer(circular buffer) structure maintained in
> reorder library to store reordered packets and other details of buffer like
> head to drain the packet from, min sequence number and other details.
> b)Library will provide insert and drain functions to
> reorder and fetch out the reordered packets respectively.
> c)Users of library should pass the packets to insert functions for
> reordering.
>
> Insertion logic:
> Sequence number of current packet will be used to calculate offset in
> reorder buffer and write packet to the location in the reorder buffer
> corresponding to offset.
> Offset is calculated as difference of current
> packet sequence number and sequence number associated with reorder buffer.
>
> During sequence number wrapping or wrapping over of reorder buffer size,
> before inserting the new packet we should move offset number of packets to
> other buffer called overflow buffer and advance the head of reorder buffer
> by "offset-reorder buffer size" and insert the new packet.
>
> Insert function:
> int rte_reorder_insert(struct rte_reorder_buffer *buffer, struct rte_mbuf
> *mbuf);
> Note: Other insert function is also under plan to insert burst of packets.
>
> Reorder buffer:
> struct rte_reorder_buffer {
> unsigned int size; /* The size (number of entries) of the
> buffer. */
> unsigned int mask; /* Mask (size - 1) of the buffer */
> unsigned int head; /* Current head of buffer */
> uint32_t min_seqn; /* latest sequence number associated with
> buffer */
> struct rte_mbuf *entries[MAX_REORDER_BUFFER_SIZE]; /* buffer to
> hold reordered mbufs */
> };
>
> d)Users can fetch out the reordered packets by drain function provided by
> library. Users must pass the mbuf array , drain function should fill
> passed mbuff array with the reordered buffer packets.
> During drain operation, overflow buffer packets will be fetched out first
> and then reorder buffer.
>
> Drain function:
> int rte_reorder_drain(struct rte_reorder_buffer *buffer,
> struct rte_mbuf **mbufs)
>
> Thanks,
> Reshma
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Shannon Limited
> Registered in Ireland
> Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
> Registered Number: 308263
> Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the
> sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others
> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-09 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-07 9:33 Pattan, Reshma
2014-10-07 11:21 ` Neil Horman
2014-10-08 14:11 ` Pattan, Reshma
2014-10-08 19:15 ` Neil Horman
2014-10-09 10:27 ` Pattan, Reshma
2014-10-09 11:36 ` Neil Horman
2014-10-09 14:36 ` Pattan, Reshma
2014-10-09 16:09 ` Neil Horman
2014-10-09 17:21 ` Matthew Hall
2014-10-09 17:55 ` Neil Horman
2014-10-08 22:41 ` Matthew Hall
2014-10-08 22:55 ` Neil Horman
2014-10-08 23:07 ` Matthew Hall
2014-10-09 9:14 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-10-09 17:11 ` Matthew Hall
2014-10-10 10:59 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-10-09 19:01 ` Jay Rolette [this message]
2014-10-17 9:44 ` Pattan, Reshma
2014-10-17 16:26 ` Jay Rolette
2014-10-18 17:26 ` Matthew Hall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADNuJVpwfiC2x3joDnkgUX=fpEMe2MAS46ozkvojsaKy0=UGZA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rolette@infiniteio.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).