From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ua0-f176.google.com (mail-ua0-f176.google.com [209.85.217.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4FA2C8 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:41:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ua0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 20so97103251uak.0 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:41:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infinite-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vlE4bpE/tw/V3sL4TIbKREwGt2NaoDoCF1L8TERH2A8=; b=DAnMwx7sG6MLqmkQUJloBXKTVem6HprMpFIN211VB/nmyVwVSXV3l5grUOQxD224MP 3KkcpBD5HEjEoIUlzCzoDo/7mzgdRlDTQ/lqScFgjW2Fp6Y99r84VBF8kxZj+llhGB8a Q7XY2W186q2gYwVgroXeOSegHxAiyBWhncdKV38qvue5O8LBok7w4Rinio/3UzuxnMrt +XYym7xVGfneOj5fsbs7An5vYlxUMO/jGGjAkX6udnV/Cms8133440oXkkJsgWccruvj T9FOc0634g91IzPOi7QzuGQ/RhqI5xyKXf57krHqpp4Z6kTw5iLlS1mVVi47d5wS6IxL 8OMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vlE4bpE/tw/V3sL4TIbKREwGt2NaoDoCF1L8TERH2A8=; b=JEmE8vLmgZIslMO5MHgCnKfPSpnuPeqXi1q0CX3UFzNoUqlelvQT6rXzrQU8LQZuQK v4JuTMpt63JG2B3dRcXW9/GoDTjX+3EBfLT5CQOB434pCRv0xiSiXkDgv6JVmrFqoafD welpei/IausFvm0WUs93bKZkxIdJM9q/dgQLRn4TEy/9OKZI22fVoUySO34Uoa29cY0e EXVY+0VG/aJqIPydkhq/BF+jf0UitV27Bcl8w2dH9+fYS0lER+iMxamjWjmXvdWifZCo Q/SrsZFLUXKReG+ToGtfeXNQCtCsf6eAhscSFia14yoTY029VMcw0SKeivk447Zud2Te KsYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01Funu6ZNW/bNsuP2sWnAZ7ddhySUxVdHnPsWKsdm7zVI7P62lb4zr5yzY1jQYxzA0hGj5pl6+Nyx319w== X-Received: by 10.176.2.21 with SMTP id 21mr77781149uas.11.1481586068714; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:41:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.82.15 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:41:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20161212211222.GA50316@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1481570642-15138-1-git-send-email-lboccass@brocade.com> <20161212211222.GA50316@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Jay Rolette Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:41:08 -0600 Message-ID: To: Bruce Richardson Cc: Luca Boccassi , DPDK , Christian Ehrhardt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] SDK: Add scripts to initialize DPDK runtime X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:41:09 -0000 On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Bruce Richardson < bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 07:24:02PM +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > From: Christian Ehrhardt > > > > A tools/init directory is added with dpdk-init, a script that can be > > used to initialize a DPDK runtime environment. 2 config files with > > default options, dpdk.conf and interfaces, are provided as well > > together with a SysV init script and a systemd service unit. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi > > Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt > > --- > > > new file mode 100755 > > index 0000000..89e0399 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tools/init/dpdk-init.in > > @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@ > > +#!/bin/sh > > +# > > +# dpdk-init: startup script to initialize a dpdk runtime environment > > +# > > +# Copyright 2015-2016 Canonical Ltd. > > +# Autor: Stefan Bader > > +# Autor: Christian Ehrhardt > > +# > > +# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or > modify > > +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3, > > +# as published by the Free Software Foundation. > > +# > > +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > > +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > > +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > > +# GNU General Public License for more details. > > +# > > +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > > +# along with this program. If not, see < > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > > +# > > Any particular reason this is licensed under GPL v3. AFAIK, all the > userspace code in DPDK is licensed under a BSD license (with the > exception of some dual licensed stuff which is shared between kernel and > userspace). I just worry that adding additional licenses into the mix > may confuse things. > > Regards, > /Bruce > Most generally, shouldn't any patch that isn't compatible with the standard DPDK license be rejected? With the specific exception for the KNI kernel bits that require different licenses... Jay