From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D622DA04B1;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:39:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E76DE3;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:39:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com (mail-oi1-f176.google.com
 [209.85.167.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D24E255
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:39:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id j7so11775954oij.9
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=EaakKlg2JbkUpU8BkMUF3/iyIoSu4lwSunPIbKGlTeE=;
 b=Cx+JS9LV45q+DumwSJP0CsxVQeGiqmSo9WinIWWCWfrJ+d2xR5Na+3vREwdPe0/ReE
 3yL1x+yTAJ90J0H2qx0O6lvxHPGl4/8Hgr34nGsg1gpYgbeWW++virt0odpQ7jgbsbmN
 odmeF4Hk5zyX4aLUQVom5V48Jh88qewWiO2iw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=EaakKlg2JbkUpU8BkMUF3/iyIoSu4lwSunPIbKGlTeE=;
 b=iwig0BIPIhKecKO1WcaceG/FAR/1bPP0iweYP396HZ2ZgziNgNaASFxuW2+MlJufBF
 gQVL/bNYw8xiE4QhUdy6HIEFyvqR4oFM2p3DWBkofk5UaW38jWyJkr27fnyPclMLrrzP
 V1u62Og0N+hfOgvQgJPNtWqdA3mbrBE5bZJNF5trDKfq5DswmYSGLHHNuCOJSF/v/o7Z
 1g1WGCHBraKuC2NRcImF3OV4LXzqFXweLLALdAIvXBd7steMA8kGH/hzvcV0aM7Xai+l
 JTPIbnbsMQQXlpC598/yl4F9X0ZI/eLD5h1uLlJM8dkgIbGe/ojXkoMDcBXgHPIi5J2M
 2QYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531J4telq6tbsDBXFuJzbcAUG7E2RHQy5eDpaCU/SWf1D4GXWS76
 svF73RcbnHiVk8kXfUdW9HQTVwPZ3Hl17kwkF7whm0eCbcc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyx0HtAtk26mcGntuajjTUCd6bcnu2LL6w1mCpEQRlyGjFyuna2Jp0FzgLPgyV5O/yGgql93R8x+aqcWgzhubs=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:a84a:: with SMTP id r71mr1245304oie.81.1598366379382; 
 Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyeNEDKjT5eKHYWvmag2-cc3xFmnpK8UkouauX57P-+DYA47w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyeNEDKjT5eKHYWvmag2-cc3xFmnpK8UkouauX57P-+DYA47w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@broadcom.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:39:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyeNECOmEO0L1Jp1wWZhV_77Pjyqw=OSGojySYEkGLVK2iHCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] question regarding rx checksum offload flags
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:11 PM Lance Richardson
<lance.richardson@broadcom.com> wrote:
<snip>
> The IP header checksum status for the outer IP header should determine
> whether this flag is set in ol_flags:
>     PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD

A simpler question might be simply "how is PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD"
intended to be used?
It seems to be intended to be set if the outer IP checksum is not
correct.. do I have that right?

Thanks,
   Lance