From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C94A054F; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:16:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2EC160789; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:16:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oo1-f45.google.com (mail-oo1-f45.google.com [209.85.161.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3096D4069B for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:16:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oo1-f45.google.com with SMTP id x19so582175ooj.10 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:16:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hMhxhOX2IBUvQP93CDZKS9SVWTHZA1GDmty8QYTFJuc=; b=fmDit9+IHbaWAgOfht2jYm2w5RmgsFktOuwK6BalbDkhwURyE6NlvHF+ZuHwBPSOAq /HgC0jhCssiDB+pgRdHc4gQmGZ7eEtg/3PDxaqoDqzr3T7xYIknwiEzR0xDr2b4v8Ykt 5qPnX7/NyJ3EkA+CYJ40KJ48zZOLrnnysnmq0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hMhxhOX2IBUvQP93CDZKS9SVWTHZA1GDmty8QYTFJuc=; b=ht/ZqG6rHD7XftN1dqGc2gt0XTWye5z/le1tkbKyeT9IKJ3F1SAO5KLXboEcBMfT6P WrWqlDt5XWL2Jip10ZNOe+Pooe2JCG92d+TrHmXUpgIzOd69e2ovv/IG+rPkw9n/CAao m+TMKm6MObL4H5oQxpLWU5g/UfQFOSGnAXDtjVwNyPxa6u7Rf2nCv8ImkIUUo9l+WOKV prQubpeoq6UCzoidnLm8u3psfsGPdy1ZhKFIdGiHK0ikkqS/Auvu3iXffMj+KSoyww5h KYx/DhO++n6YOyJl4hQ3eq5kbyNazJxhGM2zdrrZNGY5PlOYb7lnjyggF3LC47gxWaTz 5sQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532l/tPJA2KZOk/Bh3npG2FoATzSeTMNd1FwGotfqmeJp1te9MIu cwmvk03SKvodsrvCaKspJSTVgf9tfdGbJvZWeKILPw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwk0qHlnX3+nXazP3w9eShkShyE1y6UEqKYDolbBPpRcRDrhzUXYDqvSfZF1cSRA7Jx6tccIm2/JsVCsnOUnbU= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:6b44:: with SMTP id h4mr2808545oof.38.1614179802312; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:16:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210129223554.103012-1-lance.richardson@broadcom.com> <2946497.zBJjzZiKe1@thomas> <64df8a5a-9599-927b-6408-d2dfd6e29221@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <64df8a5a-9599-927b-6408-d2dfd6e29221@intel.com> From: Lance Richardson Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:16:30 -0500 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Ajit Khaparde , Wisam Monther , Wenzhuo Lu , Xiaoyun Li , Bernard Iremonger , Olivier Matz , Andrew Rybchenko , "dev@dpdk.org" , Kalesh Anakkur Purayil Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="000000000000bd09a905bc168505" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.05] app/testpmd: count outer IP checksum errors X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" --000000000000bd09a905bc168505 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Lance, can you spare some time to make the above mentioned patch? Sure. Are you looking for something like the changes below, or also including a search and replace of the deprecated macro name with the new one? - /** External IP header checksum error. */ +/** + * Deprecated. + * This flag has been renamed, use PKT_RX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM_BAD instead. + */ +#define PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD (1ULL << 5) + +/** + * This flag is set when the outermost IP header checksum is detected as + * wrong by the hardware. + */ #define PKT_RX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM_BAD (1ULL << 5) /** --000000000000bd09a905bc168505--