From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kimbyeonggi@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vc0-f179.google.com (mail-vc0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.220.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96016590C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 07:31:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hq11so11813964vcb.38
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=zJiqhuT3H6NdN5kakYk/7wU8Xm7dRC500UoD1q4nd/k=;
 b=dRi+gDIVlrAeyLByqhvjdfJSE3hrzSscTurS9ZvcjpYjAN1lQr6LtYA5O74jVqCTot
 afwxGC66Tr9g+Rlk9hM8ZMUA2DbUlsZEmM0nxHPXpmQOeTl7CQtVgbHy8OSZDizhiIng
 JbRMIOHgGA6lzplUKzl2AogjHN3ky25PtP+2Hy4kYrfV9RVfzm55poFAOjkdfoh2GOSI
 q6ge8Ieng8vkq5JfmRJqg7KbyRdjYIoV8eMjZpxUvrdrUL67HYF0+jvE4FR94G5UIvP2
 4z08d/Vm1f3jIaqgqLBGJOaso3+UgXaSCf8ZkJysx5K4KONGOfjIV2m8xtTTfHe5Bc0J
 xS1A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.142.102 with SMTP id rv6mr2122225vdb.26.1408685686588;
 Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.221.61.1 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B6059B2012717B4390714544B1F509E110D59B4A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <CAEHt_JbcTEFa6K8n78e+8=cAJoeZcAGJMhqa0KnBCpeyOm3aiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD16F236028A64DBBC0158B1636EA4510F309FC@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <B6059B2012717B4390714544B1F509E110D59B4A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:34:46 +0900
Message-ID: <CAEHt_JZ+tB3MD+X7qmKhgc9Qkqo6r0j9OBtt0DtRO4Ys6GcS2Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: BYEONG-GI KIM <kimbyeonggi@gmail.com>
To: "Cao, Min" <min.cao@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 05:31:07 -0000

Dear Cao Min

Thank you for the information.

Best regards

Byeong-Gi KIM


2014-08-22 14:30 GMT+09:00 Cao, Min <min.cao@intel.com>:

> Hi Byeong-Gi KIM,
>
> We tested with platform as below. Pls take information below as reference.
>
> Cpu: Genuine Intel(R) CPU   4000  @ 2.41GHz
> NIC: Niantic 82599
> Bios: EDVLCRB1.86B.0008.R00.1303061138
> OS: 3.4.18-yocto-standard(32/64 bit) or FC20
>
> We validated the test cases list below:
>    pmd
>    Checksum
>    Ipv4frag
>    Hello_world
>    Flow director
>    Jumboframe and scatter
>    Ieee1588
>    Multiprocess
>    Flow control
>    Whitelist
>    blacklist
>    vlan
>
> Regards,
> Cao Min
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of BYEONG-GI KIM
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:04 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm now using Intel Atom processor C2758 on the DPDK testing machines, but
> it seems not working.
>
> Which sample application would be recommended to test the NIC actually
> works well with DPDK?
>
> Best regards
>
> Byeong-Gi KIM
>
>