From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ranlevi098@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-f196.google.com (mail-ob0-f196.google.com
 [209.85.214.196]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC386959
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:56:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ob0-f196.google.com with SMTP id wp4so3456294obc.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:56:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=p63m9a89mWkEbcsljplj30Htf2vGvjlHGrzujUQ9kDc=;
 b=HKehkeWXM5rw9wwkw41CxDll/5JpF2V5caksxc1bgtXSMJoi5hhXhErdWsjA7aVYC8
 AFUR4JaeOo0OD+qgTdB1TgwtOAF6B4IkUqhKXvC8t0CLPwLzuRrWYXPh4t9dTEmJZj70
 4sqH0WIvjiFIdhsbJo488VZiyX0z5oZn17GlaEkTdJMTAOc9ppPZSee7rM2gUm9tKxQ6
 Kfr7dKFMdgnZ7WXpdHDT/ls8A6K966WTpgnZ+dYem1S7XJ2oYb/kgEjMA76IjNTj1tXE
 /osRw+IFTabUFbqC2VhYzerabtwir+Ad3X7qS80QUg+sjMlu9toXl1FLdral3aGXmR9G
 wl2w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.60.162 with SMTP id i2mr17907132obr.20.1418619402222;
 Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.228.6 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 06:56:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEQdPQMy4zb72JtjW6uE8fyAr7ubisVafLtxFgjt8YdnE0UZUw@mail.gmail.com>
From: ran levi <ranlevi098@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Multi cores performance degradation
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 04:56:43 -0000

Hi,

I'm new to dpdk - played with execution_path, l2fwd and l3fwd examples.
I'm using 82599ES intel dual 10G interface on Xeon X5650 2.67GHz.

I got the following strange results with my tests:

1) Sending 10G in port 0 only - stand in line rate (no misses).
2) Sending 10G in port 1 only - stand in line rate.
3) Sending 20G (ports 0 and 1) and preform rte_eth_rx_burst() on both ports
with single lcore - stand in line rate .
4) Sending 20G (ports 0 and 1) and receiving each port in different lcore -
can't stand in line rate (rx misses).

I do not transmit the packets - just call rte_eth_rx_burst(), increase the
counters and free the mbuf.
All the lcores are on socket 0 (the one closer to the interface).

Any idea? How can i get line rate with multi cores?

Thanks,

Ran.