From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <anupam.kapoor@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com (mail-it0-f65.google.com
 [209.85.214.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08722B8C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 04:26:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-it0-f65.google.com with SMTP id e203so1542410itc.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=I4MKRxb6E2TqNR4/996XRUavMSIcViafvulc7ciCLJ0=;
 b=jcEUvldsEIAEQB/aKCzAEpxnXLl1fKcwFKn81KTODERwkJJ89gBNpImFdPbLVPOZLy
 fa9As7C4xYxZTCEPqmHAOFsZ65JCta5YUhf1bSxxeyg6A0+KrskfprRj3bHOfqqMMYyB
 L5khyF5yKn/q4T2NEFEfsVVi/AJWla02tGA727+UHYS0Om6ifp9DJO4QEd0U3GW/7jW/
 b1gWkxcZ9Cu/F3UWThU/5TreahZxEOip/LZyyeBe6HhXVHHAR+5fcvFtxZOPfpVzEwcx
 y1QXm9wlmSfXtlSfqL4y8WVEjY/RIJ9POqTNTxmFzqnVkuPuz4IpaMCJdcSFhp3dDpsX
 osbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=I4MKRxb6E2TqNR4/996XRUavMSIcViafvulc7ciCLJ0=;
 b=fqE4m14N6gRQ3STe9b6LbkAIhTizkMgWdS6GYnB2ThoBuTn23KRVNmhjQbgJKHRu4b
 9prUbB7sgKseZL6ZVnKpO2Vj+AYN1WT2isgoLKs7IIYz+4up991Ok9HZeQxxnE99UqzU
 cUza+h77zvb1DvDwvTRZT0J/UKTWTJx/YRJupwISb1ZYVXXXlJuaSJJ+N66Q+dXbfJud
 HG43VbRncd6qYOPmExflV0Qq97crwBceljM6udZHlDM8C/w1pzvvtcus4CLOw0Jr1Ik8
 cj9uM0tz4Yqw+ZbRlJxJmBvFRboAw8SlKo2FflBZOTQe0I6nbOpJub1DKZ2mfGsPjYz2
 lcYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkNlmGRxiUBJqDiYH2EgXEopv6lxec02fvO0DuJhLjAOBCHCiHyF1jiA36eg22P2t9e0HgHw0rBzdZXmQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.75.88 with SMTP id y85mr5258216oia.99.1477103187075;
 Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.169.9 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <68694134d146c7848435452dad3446d9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <68694134d146c7848435452dad3446d9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anupam Kapoor <anupam.kapoor@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 07:56:26 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEXHiZFwbn=AjQsH8p-t6an373z2K9BYAVkYvQ1bB=Tek+i7VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ananda Sathyanarayana <ananda@versa-networks.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Vignesh Chinnakkannu <vigc@versa-networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Manual link speed/duplex configuration not working
 with DPDK
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 02:26:29 -0000

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Ananda Sathyanarayana <
ananda@versa-networks.com> wrote:

> Looks like the above patch is not accepted by the DPDK community yet.  An=
y
> specific reason ?
>

primary reason seems to be because the patch was not in correct format and
e1000 had no maintainer identified. since the latter is now there, the
former can be resent ?

=E2=80=8B--
thanks
anupam=E2=80=8B


--=20
In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and Emacs
was the lambda.