From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF979A81 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:15:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id a4so97062570wme.1 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:15:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=tG8nUfd1RkCIbkofchGGxc8UP0eCODB/xMPaoe53LLE=; b=rhK7ZvHQX4Je6Rd29pkCSG5jmiHzD5o3kQGDSJK4lL7dHyjPf9M+PGhT4BtxCA/O/h wqR7TuvczCIEk2Kv4xvak0uqkmUvOUmaxIRyn9ivZz96cnlTd0d8RPxm/y3D0gcBfpsV WbZdcndik6+t5GijM8Iu9i49it2Wkrxne7Q71PVjeNIELvqllaGNEfhxKV7dqXQINXql Bhl0Pn1fiube+h2Wfdm1Pw5EoXN5sy/L8kGcxgBgeG5BRFHj1WyFV0g7rpyXGQuFd8I0 kch49uIuNFtvv5A61devRoOc4CauiqS7ghYWwwdFlL5u2+METP/Gtk49y63YuH9DOIKs DJDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=tG8nUfd1RkCIbkofchGGxc8UP0eCODB/xMPaoe53LLE=; b=JjOl3yjk/0Iy0ld2qoxrvKGgkWRWLz9tQ1nzMxSMHCjf93ABw56oSjF8w90X4wQm8q QY0JoE6uZW2COcFkb8uy5dKGNzi6gYFFEU50bazK5DbP3kLcbOnPLd2+id/2rtTRMzmY QKtw/Et6J5qY+0WlL86wsPSoR02FwBjzZBZl4ibxCWuLaZ9eowpvjTdHGXIF7x0PO6Fn loGqEVa3N0rm/pMXQtQgiqKUGp8mulq/ugj4yQla/braH9PGsUic4lBd0wtBFVnwEKFl gWhYun9TR3b9eo5UEP7cWHcDlQ5dEGjAhB/LNEp3exZ19kcEVZrtRVSflcG4fFJkOifW UbMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSGgleCy/cRVk0DjjUQXWpUqI/nMnxNX9co5UKXt94lYhZ+pWnBZgIUsOySybWJCwmDfDlE0Q6TtuydGg== X-Received: by 10.28.153.14 with SMTP id b14mr20418886wme.93.1455624954724; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:15:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: marc.sune@gmail.com Received: by 10.27.95.202 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:15:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Marc Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:15:35 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ntvzp-8IezwjlFQAZm9HfzDApI0 Message-ID: To: "Mcnamara, John" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang compilation broken? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:15:55 -0000 On 16 February 2016 at 12:49, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Marc > > Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 10:21 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang compilation broken? > > > > It seems compilation for clang Linux target is broken: > > > >... > > > > marc@dpdk:~/dpdk$ clang --version > > Debian clang version 3.5.0-10 (tags/RELEASE_350/final) (based on LLVM > > 3.5.0) > > Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > > Thread model: posix > > > > Any ideas? > > Hi, > > I built clang 3.5.0 and built DPDK successfully with it on FC23: > > $ /tmp/llvm-3.5.0.src/Release+Asserts/bin/clang --version > clang version 3.5.0 (tags/RELEASE_350/final) > Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > Thread model: posix > > What OS version are you using? > Debian 8, amd64 Regards Marc > > John > >