From: Dhananjaya Reddy Eadala <edreddy@gmail.com>
To: "Qiu, Michael" <michael.qiu@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: fix memcmp function pointer in multi-process
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:01:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF0y47HyFsfdPuttZoLzvEPHHU_CUFoSuAkiO3C=wMqgv38jEA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028622F5ACB9@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Michael
Please find the attached is the patch file generated from "git format-patch
-1"
Thanks
Dhana
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Qiu, Michael <michael.qiu@intel.com> wrote:
> On 3/2/2016 2:57 AM, Dhananjaya Reddy Eadala wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > We found a problem in dpdk-2.2 using under multi-process environment.
> > Here is the brief description how we are using the dpdk:
> >
> > We have two processes proc1, proc2 using dpdk. These proc1 and proc2 are
> > two different compiled binaries.
> > proc1 is started as primary process and proc2 as secondary process.
> >
> > proc1:
> > Calls srcHash = rte_hash_create("src_hash_name") to create rte_hash
> > structure.
> > As part of this, this api initalized the rte_hash structure and set the
> > srcHash->rte_hash_cmp_eq to the address of memcmp() from proc1 address
> > space.
> >
> > proc2:
> > calls srcHash = rte_hash_find_existing("src_hash_name"). This returns
> the
> > rte_hash created by proc1.
> > This srcHash->rte_hash_cmp_eq still points to the address of memcmp()
> from
> > proc1 address space.
> > Later proc2 calls rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(srcHash, (const void*) &key,
> > key.sig);
> > Under the hood, rte_hash_lookup_with_hash() invokes
> > __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(), which in turn calls
> h->rte_hash_cmp_eq(key,
> > k->key, h->key_len).
> > This leads to a crash as h->rte_hash_cmp_eq is an address from proc1
> > address space and is invalid address in proc2 address space.
> >
> > We found, from dpdk documentation, that
> > "
> > The use of function pointers between multiple processes running based of
> > different compiled
> > binaries is not supported, since the location of a given function in one
> > process may be different to
> > its location in a second. This prevents the librte_hash library from
> > behaving properly as in a multi-
> > threaded instance, since it uses a pointer to the hash function
> internally.
> >
> >
> > To work around this issue, it is recommended that multi-process
> > applications perform the hash
> > calculations by directly calling the hashing function from the code and
> > then using the
> > rte_hash_add_with_hash()/rte_hash_lookup_with_hash() functions instead
> of
> > the functions which do
> > the hashing internally, such as rte_hash_add()/rte_hash_lookup().
> > "
> >
> > We did follow the recommended steps by invoking
> rte_hash_lookup_with_hash().
> > It was no issue up to and including dpdk-2.0. In later releases started
> > crashing because rte_hash_cmp_eq is introduced in dpdk-2.1
> >
> > We fixed it with the following patch and would like to submit the patch
> to
> > dpdk.org.
>
> Could you send the patch in the mail?
>
> Learn how to send a patch:
>
> http://www.dpdk.org/dev
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
> > Patch is created such that, if anyone wanted to use dpdk in multi-process
> > environment with function pointers not shared, they need to
> > define RTE_LIB_MP_NO_FUNC_PTR in their Makefile. Without defining this
> flag
> > in Makefile, it works as it is now.
> >
> >
> > Please find here attached is the patch file.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Dhana
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-01 18:56 Dhananjaya Reddy Eadala
2016-03-02 2:29 ` Qiu, Michael
2016-03-02 14:01 ` Dhananjaya Reddy Eadala [this message]
2016-03-02 14:22 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-03-03 3:39 ` Dhananjaya Reddy Eadala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAF0y47HyFsfdPuttZoLzvEPHHU_CUFoSuAkiO3C=wMqgv38jEA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=edreddy@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=michael.qiu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).