From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C3946212; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:10:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A0942EA9; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:10:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f53.google.com (mail-io1-f53.google.com [209.85.166.53]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C5440287 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:10:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-8553108e7a1so57282439f.2 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 03:10:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind.com; s=google; t=1739445026; x=1740049826; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6wWLjhp3SElpBBr4U/XEAFoYWI5RLawY1OQ8YARIqs0=; b=QDX/pfK0uLUabdO8xdB4URfE5AzyQnWimT68H5tfUhR1l5xDRCx7pF14t7heXHd3E/ FpmIMvWZGf41dnqV/UquLgSiU8TLEtARPP5v0we1oq0Fdgei6/9vCyYJU/EKpwd2Pk3V FctwAy9Ja+lNJRcb0AB1o8hu3ymOgrCFFePyxAwmnnCAAM+54Y6rHWe7bCpydxox3XDm LW0chPc+pnWv3htFfy0E811QAzPb2N4an+MJmRjotgNsah4TmWW8cy7YfV2ToUDxsPcO yJ05hrNTjAKtbRhPv22AtUZVU2qiQoGPYqCti6nueTGjwOazZ5A7aFsuqyihZxC6rAMq 9H6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739445026; x=1740049826; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6wWLjhp3SElpBBr4U/XEAFoYWI5RLawY1OQ8YARIqs0=; b=mwmsE0XmPXS/JQqcceacVeQLJ6pzpWOVT8O1SLC7UsFYEas9GnNIOLrFsiG2bBDZiD rHSN/Kia1IURRGT1bbY69lfJclkAMQrudgzEKjSC3dQ9aGpMkg7wRuM3SzoCxtiCs/7f ywZm+pdmOH2l1L0GINNm5ZY8jsAbgGA0aat4JMSZXDY4JaSjRxGnXDdfEp707K2Db5fn Tr7kob6GUmjMOXfzs9rOGsG5P28HojCKn+ea917iz3ZkcXb7+etysfWf+tMRoJsBt+48 6l6H5JQfx6urbR6OwoD9umtsv0ek46l5RppYF4b1j4AaGQDEi0K0oHuOTKZmpHM5mAtN U7VA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz/gAaYvHtLj4dkxhxje4AnA4XEhkrsSSABk594UvYzMyv9BX5A bWWnjIAIHeTZl/Q59ieIvSpxi7tDtPEN7b/+UMoaPwUeXc/HZrvVqvoHDfYpDupF2HGzeC1yHgC VtHb+zXdXAy8+cPZd9NIVWByyYq8zvx0NutJd9g== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvQmzmRmTdOx+zTGMwOtW5CjPkNJZ/paPp0eTNpwwjquYFbJi/OXuHtl43G4lc P4f/p4RS3uz5RmfbfNs2aJ1d469cO81ssUwd5bnppB/VGINwsnWKpR9QxThDDd3Ru68Ma1tQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGR7x/nWAupDZlAH7hgaiBIlCVAeatgNm4fsF0zYd8Hiakt21X6fwhbwbD6IcbGB1BoLjb3tVTkvHOnC73w3Qc= X-Received: by 2002:a92:ca0f:0:b0:3d0:618c:1b18 with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-3d17be05b76mr62044525ab.1.1739445026670; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 03:10:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250119174643.2162110-1-ariel.otilibili@6wind.com> <20250120122156.2480524-1-ariel.otilibili@6wind.com> <20250120122156.2480524-3-ariel.otilibili@6wind.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ariel Otilibili Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 12:10:15 +0100 X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZkEMYJyWzaGzV9ESFmU2kHUF61LI05q8xn85_FbnD0Yd3-MuqDhYGJOUX4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mempool: make rte_mempool_create_empty a single-exit To: Konstantin Ananyev Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "stable@dpdk.org" , Thomas Monjalon , David Marchand , Andrew Rybchenko , =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ebe9fb062e041ab1" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000ebe9fb062e041ab1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Konstantin, On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 3:31=E2=80=AFPM Konstantin Ananyev < konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com> wrote: > Personally, I don't see much profit in such refactoring. > Then, please drop this patch. I gave room for other people to react, none came up. Thanks for your feedback, Ariel > > > 2.30.2 > > < > --000000000000ebe9fb062e041ab1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Konstantin,

On Fri, Feb 7= , 2025 at 3:31=E2=80=AFPM Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com> wrote:
Personally, I don't= see much profit in such refactoring.

T= hen, please drop this patch. I gave room for other people to react, none ca= me up.

Thanks for your feedback,
Ariel

> 2.30.2
> <
--000000000000ebe9fb062e041ab1--