From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com (mail-lb0-f177.google.com [209.85.217.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A0E5924 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 15:03:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id s7so1934298lbd.36 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 06:03:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Wj7HAXNOpQvC/Z+D6GcczY6Jmucn++RSJyWcnw0mPe4=; b=z+yusRTfPUGvKalAcCK8g0TkMki29Bo23NeXiQWVk0DnEKsfP6764b3BjI48XiC/9h 4aOSOE0VJAkefulLb0lg2kCh1h19rOzkzwIrSyX+DhQa0WNTiNuEXjkste8/ug9VDcIh a7edowDc3LtLdN3eIXbIZgKX9fXQT2CMoYnJYI6BnjGqQ7Z7PRr+f26o6pphkvp7ZmGz Dpce4nqx0S3OfxgOh5sI5IVFMcgRRlTxOspUoq338794mK3Qfuus3nobu0e97xp0v1ho HPI2WpUtpcPUiJ1+KwpMenemRcD5Wv8cDmMRwRnBHmCuya5NOD86A7f9r2w4AwPzZDUv RVyw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.150.130 with SMTP id ui2mr1351088lbb.80.1401627838841; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 06:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.23.170 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 06:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 18:33:58 +0530 Message-ID: From: Venkat Thummala To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] L2 FWD / L3 FWD performance with Rx and Tx ports on different sockets X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:03:47 -0000 Hi, I guess, the current L2 FWD / L3 FWD performance numbers are observed with both Rx and Tx ports connected to the same Socket. Does anyone have the performance numbers with Rx and Tx ports on two different sockets? How does DDIO come in to picture in this case? I believe DDIO comes in to picture only on the local socket. What will happen on the remote socket in this case? Regards Venkat