From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com [209.85.217.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCA4AFD6 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:29:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 10so3890092lbg.18 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:29:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gnFrxwHjmlSUYz66zZ6Npu7BNN579B0RJR4rhrHC45c=; b=NYz6UjMgFg9/P83vEEJyuCUeoU2hSzigebR6Br6CPoVFGpmPOLfs38YivscRkGZ3Ja MYeB5QeytAM0aWfYkghR5Dl8rjmjXP9XqKCnCnVjyounqy89mvH+CgiY7tg+0WXs1dSO eU05AxxRLb4l09uFzUdXA0dbsR8K7HOBzD/evySirql1ZU6KBdoF46PMBjuOpurb6aZT FpwbYynRkizq5TNePooo/ffxy1ncscaS74ti5yJANsWCiXwSPsgzzE6zNcoAg4M8fsg9 KaQayn2o2qt4FH2SSDtJhA6ssORjmD0DzQWZ7Q04pK2eDtEzxYuJPzndPV6Cpg/1IeNf zMiA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.43.98 with SMTP id v2mr353179lal.83.1402403372111; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.23.170 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:29:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:59:32 +0530 Message-ID: From: Venkat Thummala To: Uri Sidler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] sharing rte_malloc() address between processes. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:29:18 -0000 Hi, Yo =E2=80=A2 The multi-process feature requires that the exact same hugepage m= emory mappings be present in all applications. The Linux security feature - Address-Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) can interfere with this mapping, so it may be necessary to disable this feature in order to reliably run multi-process applications. On 10 June 2014 17:17, Uri Sidler wrote: > How can I share the addresses between processes? > Is there a simple way of doing so? > > thanks, > Shirley. >