From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468F2B0BA for ; Sun, 18 May 2014 16:07:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id n15so2941123wiw.9 for ; Sun, 18 May 2014 07:07:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=90iuxgvmKesyNoYlGpNWWv8RptdxeqlX62lavNLtn1c=; b=IbwiiG8xhzAm3cA4BDi2sGDP2+RUwsNph0k5J4Dd2tpka+43fnCi/g+XPVxGft2gI3 F/yMCkh0Z+6Lb76snTlSAdo3cNisfOKT2BV/0btFEnprZE0qEE9zl8A4Ywvk4ndQK3gd 2kYIuqMEYIb5QDtOPm6pzUbimTvcaXqrtflYB4nzyWD15Vek0COs8Lojzx5CHCUiGzqd ovhJZFqyCITqewb33C37QaXlxyrZRUnWvm1TAChoHKEk+EJtwXl1Faf+loSHGZQIHJ53 4z6M72kGVsa/O2cxzdct/DDTE9qGOdYGCStIQEFMwAd3nhKOuc3dLeJVR96HtbYsyTra J4kg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.74.132 with SMTP id t4mr7903989wiv.30.1400422046653; Sun, 18 May 2014 07:07:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.164.5 with HTTP; Sun, 18 May 2014 07:07:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9273702.Nt296V5WGK@xps13> References: <9273702.Nt296V5WGK@xps13> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 17:07:26 +0300 Message-ID: From: Helmut Sim To: Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] fail to bind '82541GI Gigabit Ethernet Controller' to IGB_UIO driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 14:07:18 -0000 I am on my way to validate it... Is there a pre-defined test or checklist for validating a NIC? Thanks On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Sim, > > 2014-05-14 18:44, Helmut Sim: > > I made the required change in order to support the 82541GI chipset and I > > was able to bind it successfully to the igb_uio > > Don't hesitate to submit a patch after having validated that it's working > well. > > Thanks > -- > Thomas >