From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352C168C8 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 21:10:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wn1so3697288obc.13 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:10:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SqGhmr4Dopp1O59JQ6MxRlzLGV9iH48g5tSqmXpl/pM=; b=mnAGNCq+Buo6YeytnlLJJmDj7bfrJOYFvEuUumAs7Ab+RaKZWNYD1KAWSkNI3G4lVd NPX2kkjjVPBxZ0eGMbAgio7BvAFPmVZWvY6CRPNwlE5vKyGK8Du7YKb896rLIfBck+1s ggI3ctzLMQZkuiguMY2LC/S7FoxzRwt68aCEz8qNuLlrGTtoyxyWizxH7xYwTLOoJLnQ 4h5Mq/k8COES/I6sBCbeVwMGbFt6dSU4bDRXY/CKMTIT9pwZkAY9JJG49X9yRlGKb0jq O8ZTKdWVLUrq51dIwhke+SbOxErmlgl67e3uh6unWJmjq1uW+R9aJerbRknNK05R6Efh AApw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl55N+itxsuXzYLhmJWJHE6+HIfUT8Wws0ucX+K29O/vzmbSeeFlkBkzusTaxb3LnMv+fMN MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.46.135 with SMTP id v7mr2571594oem.23.1401649828906; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.226.193 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 12:10:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 04:10:28 +0900 Message-ID: From: Masaru Oki To: Prashant Upadhyaya Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Would DPDK run on AMD processors X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 19:10:17 -0000 Hi, Old AMD processors such as Phenom II does not have SSE4.2 instructions. It has problems to compile and run DPDK. 2014-05-31 15:49 GMT+09:00 Prashant Upadhyaya : > Hi, > > Has anybody attempted to run DPDK on AMD processors. > Does it run straightforward or would there be some obvious issues where > porting would be needed, I welcome any comments. > > Regards > -Prashant >