From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7FEA0518; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 18:53:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C172E8F; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 18:53:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com (mail-wr1-f52.google.com [209.85.221.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C422E81 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 18:53:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id f18so32089400wrs.0 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 09:53:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netgate.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rEDle2CdAD0f/KdZme4sg4kMpohiih7K8Pjo6p5Rg+o=; b=JlwQ1mSNweLZz2CzsUgCwssnU+1zmtYBuyea4FUYW4Se6Ezu8kOaffvFt+xqXXXXt1 aMUpvj6J0awwhEemTYPHWX9IYFmH2yLcC3I0FVBZtScorBi37ZQKzH3Ksw/F9p+KuFLh Kc6n7hAIQgOz//d9mu8qRhesNgmXwVoRklxfw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rEDle2CdAD0f/KdZme4sg4kMpohiih7K8Pjo6p5Rg+o=; b=UusT9D1VHSrPYClY3WIAXLN34N8tQkR4jrYwbk/Ykay0g0EDmOv3eTAPHvGG6Ksi+2 q5l5JHAX2jRtnJ38P7yGk2tCNBqgU+/lBZtYwesjfsjD6UXwM3KVjEb6nD/Xl4L8Tljl 9q/p0T8cec2F1PJTrNta6oaCumDXNiI+yDk2Q1HJLtCSH/iYNKoBoLNHzGPmZ/LAWa1x ELugxSVDdcmWh2OEqlNnSymRfU3s4+x9nQ+1OP1wLgZ/7RIhzu39K76mgVLvsWZLoEfK 0pkMPMhvPpdiBjpHClXgtAGB45KkHbRQsXf30BecJkFlhAVrPWNa0ieiHSVy5bD3JT7C XrMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53247V5ljJT8b+4RSnOHyIjNgCQ4t4fsRo6lZc/BKU+/4AGMHLSw QQClivULcL65J+pIJPu0+rni0d8vO9cVZsvQfsKZFw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLZucPK+NaFK9u0UP+ET7BSCR4xxYYwdfWg1V5NoJYt2rjWcYw8YBvh6TcTWAhEzXVNUGZvH1NyVFQQKJGsqc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:c:: with SMTP id h12mr11272233wrx.49.1596387232468; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 09:53:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200729120714.67bb46de@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: From: Jon Loeliger Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 11:53:39 -0500 Message-ID: To: Archit Pandey Cc: Stephen Hemminger , dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org, Gokul Bargaje , "Mohit P. Tahiliani" , Tarun Anand , Sanjana Krishnam , "Avinash ." , Leslie Monis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Queue Management Support in DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:43 AM Archit Pandey wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Thanks for the reply. > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:37 AM Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > > > rte_sched is not a generic AQM mechanism. You will have to write a new > > replacement for rte_sched if you want something else. > > Yes, we did realize that rte_sched is not suitable for AQM algorithms. > We have implemented a bare-bones AQM mechanism that is independent of > rte_sched. > Using this implementation we have successfully added and tested PIE and > CoDel. > > > I would recommend starting with Cake. It is latest and most complete > > and the developers are active and friendly. > > CAKE can be added using what we have built, but before we do that we wanted > to know if such a feature would be welcomed by the community. In a word, yes. > Subsequently, we will submit an RFC patch series to the dev mailing list. > > Thanks, > Archit Pandey. > HTH, jdl