From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75178A0525; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:42:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8B02C23; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:42:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f65.google.com (mail-io1-f65.google.com [209.85.166.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C8FFFA; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:35:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f65.google.com with SMTP id t26so32649433ioi.13; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 23:35:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=G5XBcyiEp/HSP6DErn/zIHXvzCD6OnYnexPBu+kLTnA=; b=BjtcreuJoM4v06++06LZnxVi5PRsNxwSD9VWJjP/u18xAw0calg43FWwNe7YP5tTuJ upKQzImhKou1IKO2bXWWbvuRKh99g7E0Z/wMl5bFH78j+S7f7NphkqJsdrHKgd3c03zb 2YnYuAX93+2WAU1zE35yclKPJSynTh98Mfev+vQQpVVMC1xKR6OSAnV+Skk8bEPi04jA DmltySCPeabre6x6X4Uf4qrH5fDjtjZLLNXgSOhZDr4U5azK+M64Fx9w9kAo71P+gqul iGsvxsmpv6QCkBqfG4Sob11TOXaVLVTBd8umpL+TiSLczjWNEyhmQ31VJ8c99b5QhfTc Z4TA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=G5XBcyiEp/HSP6DErn/zIHXvzCD6OnYnexPBu+kLTnA=; b=ceApWjkTyCyZ/1bujclwD9EVyN8ln0T8H6ybdUTFyPzkgZhHifG7w3imLiAbZrvG2C 34t7F9GPBf/xTWzJkWWtilphXm/RH5K389i051OPE5IoGFkW9Q3w8+BD0p8jm6dgiBRa 27hIALPU/AhSlOpLgDldsfjqgpmYfe9KR017I7YEL3FVN9XONyLX9rdA5nx4rX4inYQ7 HqTDpO5LOzbmzsSL4rII3qWeeAKfWL9WYR15W6zyENhviE1BZqdHLMWOcX1wE8B53kUd o28cxq29pvgHufPyPtQAk4niQMxyNw1cv7GZQ8Y5BXME6LSPIW50dbgXXybN9Jfuk2N7 i7qQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVT1632CqYVDkXxquBYJLya6Ct+YE/uMfLUXKhZNwHCp+0humFu ylppyX8e6jd4fP5VigzsPfZenwhtpVs9vwb/+FInFde/o4Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxfgCueu+ykAENP1ZGqV/jnr5EJaTE1BmqwF3p/ramXkmqUcp7dIL24Way20vvO7XKnPXz5a9vvkGrnDcPDRZE= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:5904:: with SMTP id n4mr42049336iob.9.1579505709499; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 23:35:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Lalithaditya Naidu Gajula Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:04:58 +0530 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:42:34 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Issue :- segmentation fault in rte_eal_wait_lcore. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi All, I got a segmentation fault issue regarding ret_eal_wait_lcore and rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(), when i am running the code in a few logical cores using rte_eal_remote _launch() function which has a while (1) (infinite loop) in all the functions launched by remote launch and when i am terminating the code with 'ctrl+c' i am getting segmentation fault at rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(), then I replaced that with rte_eal_wait_lcore() for the respective logical cores even then i am getting a segmentation fault, can anyone please clarify this issue?