From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com (mail-lf0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22751B29D for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 18:53:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f137so15388557lfe.4 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 09:53:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9whTVT+bwkkQowT7BxfdFl9POpuHQXNoRmCNKmIa27s=; b=Cuxyn3GJoCkfpaW96m3px89nlDMi/2AjzCBVNi9LzCYw2ZYLXfMzzd8ar/QgizwQ3v Nx2MfrssHxuWYk6uYTybKuw1sVSa+tg5MF281bT0NjVJ2okJY60q2EF86EnEtwTSFdXW x0Ny4ktCDhgAZ4bdWnV47/NTKSRurDD7XLL8OB8O47yQNwyh70VgtsWW+JQyjWDx5KzZ xeTySBPuFvqkH3I741X1U2c7QLvOdDclSQT3H65KKkF2unDHyXeLDkJguqLgEA3gHjAP uKqaMmImczJgdtLd/V+DaQWBu8H4yxlZVhK73kKYYp5BQkI4LtGqKqJ/H6lPTLNJs1Et 2qpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9whTVT+bwkkQowT7BxfdFl9POpuHQXNoRmCNKmIa27s=; b=gVvn7bd0S85+6dGNBrENTU+Hu6/gO9pcrUw1zZLt6WiLgNMX1LveHpZ2Uur8oSs2X5 t+R5iv/3KFqLl5wu+XiPmyxOQqZs395BrsxqbClvizsUjz2MUjvM59MbBVLbSKbc6ih3 P6FK2rwblgp8Fc5h277atpWzmGc5pmh3D0at4hbwvFo71WZjPeZgRfdO5CXWtHoZcVjw FuZqcaDVSvPyehFk++m4PvQbaLXqBpzdSjDjqPQznV/l/OHghgQ+xcPi2CG2Wq+YuCoU of+5NACwp2AHNdCF6YSf+O2lysvwv4FQDFUAKhJQCWtdNZXNwS+kTHaqAASrhzWPqaZR 538Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAhwwEoWQ7iza3v/KBOt/KzukLRIyyMa4wbCLDZLIbHRt5vLTC6 qZglQYHzxq3CpgDRwTwJFbNoxk5OCsnxlsezApU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225tPtk92W6KFOcpjiENE1w39i8i96DUs2fXfRVnHDOsjtQPfcX+QpuNbwi+tuMWXZFyDsRjVPUvfcikPW6xeIM= X-Received: by 10.25.80.92 with SMTP id z28mr1122597lfj.34.1518285219070; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 09:53:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.196.17 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 09:53:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8ddb30a3-1253-ff60-20bb-b735fef5a91c@intel.com> From: Ravi Kerur Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 09:53:38 -0800 Message-ID: To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] IXGBE, IOMMU DMAR DRHD handling fault issue X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 17:53:39 -0000 On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > On 29-Jan-18 10:35 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote: > >> Hi Burakov, >> >> When using vfio-pci on host both VF and PF interfaces works fine with >> dpdk i.e. I don't see DMAR fault messages anymore. However, when I attach a >> VF interface to a VM and start DPDK with vfio-pci inside VM I still see >> DMAR fault messages on host. Both host and VM are booted with >> 'intel-iommu=on' on GRUB. Ping from VM with DPDK/vfio-pci doesn't work (I >> think it's expected because of DMAR faults), however, when VF interface >> uses ixgbevf driver ping works. >> >> Following are some details >> >> /*****************On VM***************/ >> dpdk-devbind -s >> >> Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver >> ============================================ >> 0000:00:07.0 '82599 Ethernet Controller Virtual Function' drv=vfio-pci >> unused=ixgbevf >> >> Network devices using kernel driver >> =================================== >> 0000:03:00.0 'Device 1041' if=eth0 drv=virtio-pci unused=vfio-pci *Active* >> 0000:04:00.0 'Device 1041' if=eth1 drv=virtio-pci unused=vfio-pci >> 0000:05:00.0 'Device 1041' if=eth2 drv=virtio-pci unused=vfio-pci >> >> Other network devices >> ===================== >> >> >> Crypto devices using DPDK-compatible driver >> =========================================== >> >> >> Crypto devices using kernel driver >> ================================== >> >> >> Other crypto devices >> ==================== >> >> >> >> 00:07.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599 Ethernet Controller >> Virtual Function (rev 01) >> Subsystem: Intel Corporation 82599 Ethernet Controller Virtual >> Function >> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- >> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ >> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- >> SERR- > Region 0: Memory at fda00000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=16K] >> Region 3: Memory at fda04000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=16K] >> Capabilities: [70] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=3 Masked- >> Vector table: BAR=3 offset=00000000 >> PBA: BAR=3 offset=00002000 >> Capabilities: [a0] Express (v1) Root Complex Integrated >> Endpoint, MSI 00 >> DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0 >> ExtTag- RBE- >> DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- >> Unsupported- >> RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop- >> MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes >> DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr- >> TransPend- >> Capabilities: [100 v1] Advanced Error Reporting >> UESta: DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- >> UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol- >> UEMsk: DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- >> UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol- >> UESvrt: DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- >> UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol- >> CESta: RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- >> NonFatalErr- >> CEMsk: RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- >> NonFatalErr- >> AERCap: First Error Pointer: 00, GenCap- CGenEn- ChkCap- >> ChkEn- >> Kernel driver in use: vfio-pci >> Kernel modules: ixgbevf >> >> /***************on Host*************/ >> dmesg | grep DMAR >> ... >> [ 978.268143] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2 >> [ 978.268147] DMAR: [DMA Read] *Request device [04:10.0]* fault addr >> 33a128000 [fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set >> [ 1286.677726] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 102 >> [ 1286.677730] DMAR: [DMA Read] Request device [04:10.0] fault addr >> fb663000 [fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set >> [ 1676.436145] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202 >> [ 1676.436149] DMAR: [DMA Read] Request device [04:10.0] fault addr >> 33a128000 [fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set >> [ 1734.433649] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 302 >> [ 1734.433652] DMAR: [DMA Read] Request device [04:10.0] fault addr >> 33a128000 [fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set >> [ 2324.428938] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 402 >> [ 2324.428942] DMAR: [DMA Read] Request device [04:10.0] fault addr >> 7770c000 [fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set >> [ 2388.553640] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 502 >> [ 2388.553643] DMAR: [DMA Read] *Request device [04:10.0]* fault addr >> 33a128000 [fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set >> >> >> > Going back to this, i would like to suggest run a few tests to ensure that > we have all information that we can gather. > > First of all, i'm assuming that you're using native ixgbe Linux driver on > the host, and that you're only passing through the VF device to the VM > using VFIO. Is my understanding correct here? > > Now, let's forget about the iommu=pt and igb_uio for a moment. Boot both > your host and your VM with iommu=on and intel_iommu=on (or whatever > command-line enables full IOMMU support on both host and guest) and do the > same tests you've done before. Do you still see your issues? > > It would also be very useful to also try native Linux kernel driver on the > guest *with traffic forwarding* and see how it works in your VM. Therefore > i would suggest you to compile DPDK with PCAP support, bind your (VM) > interface to native Linux driver, and use the interface via our pcap driver > (creating a vdev should do the trick - please refer to PCAP PMD > documentation [1]). Simple forwarding test should be enough - just make > sure to pass traffic to and from DPDK in both cases, and that it doesn't > give you any DMAR errors. > > We can go from there. > > Let me just give you what has been tested and working/nonworking scenarios. Some of your questions might get answered as well. Test bed is very simple with 2 VF's created under IXGBE PF on host with one VF interface added to ovs-bridge on host and another VF interface given to guest. Test connectivity between VF's via ping. Host and guest -- Kernel 4.9 Host -- Qemu 2.11.50 (tried both released 2.11 and tip of the git (2.11.50)) DPDK -- 17.05.1 on host and guest Host and guest -- booted with GRUB intel_iommu=on (which enables IOMMU). Have tried with "iommu=on and intel_iommu=on" as well, but iommu=on is not needed when intel_iommu=on is set. Test-scenario-1: Host -- ixgbe_vf driver, Guest ixgbe_vf driver ping works Test-scenario-2: Host -- DPDK vfio-pci driver, Guest ixgbe_vf driver ping works Test-scenario-3: Host -- DPDK vfio-pci driver, Guest DPDK vfio-pci driver, DMAR errors seen on host, ping doesn't work DPDK works fine on host with vfio-pci, however, has issues when used inside the guest. Please let me know if more information is needed. Thanks, Ravi [1] http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/nics/pcap_ring.html > > -- > Thanks, > Anatoly >