From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rkerur@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (mail-oi0-f45.google.com
 [209.85.218.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7D929B6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:00:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j125so4901822oih.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:00:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=JnDrge2FN4wiGNgbtGnP95v/I9NMhNLr5lukE7PqnAo=;
 b=dZF3r2y41HCKr16yeYX7Lqhjyx05DmSe23I8460KpV16d6UGsECbel1WW7Fa/R6iyV
 5ApotwbyJKr5NhSJwUg9eQHf1rQ9Hbnxy4QVYErfyRuoYX2jqRasYqkGRSjIOXPkPH+3
 pP491dlYYn+cQxWaUBnJMeXAtao6ZHzpIoZjA6B19MnPCo9DaOxrQ/zdnA+TDGa+J8PH
 8sEV8+OfZcSmytDgGHk8WDy2/nQuUZ+s7NO22qQmhjYE/Qka/Z4yf13e1hxWZIwziRrN
 PCjoK9sI5hvRthVBsNlSwGEWsNJXPve6XA8qgYK8lyb3cfh0ZXlMvWP95YD5oUbAAdDi
 YNWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=JnDrge2FN4wiGNgbtGnP95v/I9NMhNLr5lukE7PqnAo=;
 b=XNBqLs391TB1iHPbDfnKsVP2wPk1dk8r7DmZsRmN1tYhQr5OvLDZ0ChW1XhpobsDVZ
 i/HCz8kaMehzCS0AQSW6qJNGI8m+P1+NtxX15yBk+EpaS6g74hVH+v4a7Kv7BrsgE1zd
 r36UotzbkF/N7AX2H3MzupyRfxSLTddeXBrgCSkwFi18/8Qi3nOiNz2wSy6pxIESxeLz
 WtcOEETI+93142xpDXR88Z+WwlTJMTsYe2glT91TPFTGLGP2dr7IlpKBg/lChbYQjTcP
 TDuaK2egLK/TeXDf3Ni2AP51Zh1yjEAqIMwo/qGwpi94ezJyRdyarjaX1USE8zmCBkaX
 TDvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ4x1xhIHajcsm4FLge283U5YLuAjqzAKjPOLgAYiOkanAb7Da/e6KjTLC8x0WhXZykpEfREhfwYIeOIw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.89.68 with SMTP id n65mr29661684oib.138.1456286454185;
 Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:00:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.172.71 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:00:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE0941033C7CA2@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1431979303-1346-2-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com>
 <1453950506-28067-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
 <CAFb4SLCCPKYJZYXR8ik4RWrpVmM5APkF=C1g_AFCv9Y3A-P2nw@mail.gmail.com>
 <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE0941033C7CA2@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:00:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFb4SLCZ4vCVWw5xNhjeLi0SFuOndmP+hnYhrCqbr0gD_7bxsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ravi Kerur <rkerur@gmail.com>
To: "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev,
	v3] Implement memcmp using Intel SIMD instrinsics.
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 04:00:55 -0000

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
wrote:

> > > It'd be great if you could format this patch into a patch set with
> several
> > > little ones. :-)
> > > Also, the kernel checkpatch is very helpful.
> > > Good coding style and patch organization make it easy for in-depth
> reviews.
> > >
> > Combination of scalar and vector (32/64/128) was done to get optimal
> performance numbers. If there is enough interest in this I can work on it
> and provide an updated patch set.
>
> That'll be very helpful! Looking forward to your patch :)
> BTW, have you tested real example performance with your patch?
>

Yes it was tested with hash functions in dpdk code.I will work on it and
send updated patch. Thanks for your inputs I will incorporate them in next
patch series.