From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2E86A94 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:39:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pdmh5 with SMTP id h5so16558880pdm.3 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kHPGPGKQHFlDIrutYzE0H5fCsEeyp1Exmj+CtbjU6B8=; b=q9B+EPZiOVNQd1wIB52xt9Qx+o+5h0/osrjleVyb6QR76Ea0H0x5qZAvM3kj9oYJ6h N0PqphTsgR8gaC7MtDF29QH8FoF3JvTJJbHCVTk1699+GszrpkRbQFAT6jxVshUPuf9j /8sgZ37NxghpblyUWQad00xzvm2z5cB4BNPxFfqlt9J2JSz3mqvYY21AyRHZx7J46Ddh Nj0LNpFVU4grdB4z/kd5uUN+rY6Sob7gRh7y1LPGPWHVsalamLzEj0nPs9kThB6bXDa6 PvAr0+YodDQqJEdDwcEKFQaOQ7PvFrfLE12P4Fs++qg737RDdOwUxijjdyu+xbD9LWYs dS9A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.223.36 with SMTP id qr4mr69988864pbc.50.1427827141399; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.131.3 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3432877.QZe5f6OD7e@xps13> References: <1420565095-17278-1-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> <1722908.xonNXe7smH@xps13> <3432877.QZe5f6OD7e@xps13> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:39:01 -0700 Message-ID: From: Ravi Kerur To: Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] Move EAL common function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:39:02 -0000 I will work on it and send out patches by next week. If you need it earlier please let me know. Thanks, Ravi On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-03-30 16:15, Ravi Kerur: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Thomas Monjalon < > thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote: > > > Sorry for not integrating this big refactoring in release 2.0. > > > It wasn't easy to merge it during development of some EAL features. > > > And it's now too risky to rework it before the release. > > > I think this clean-up is needed and should be done at the beginning of > 2.1 > > > cycle. We just need to rebase it and remove the "ifdef BSD/LINUX" > which was > > > introduced in pci code. > > > > > > Do you think you'll have time for it? > > > > Sure, please let me know when it is needed I can work on it. > > 2.1 cycle is starting in few days. > So the sooner is the better. > > Thanks a lot Ravi >