From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com (mail-pf0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E752C74 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:14:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o126so75675781pfb.3 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:14:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lIgPZdDYglNtveCrJ4uIVyG3rPZ/NPd0tJczY4on4PA=; b=LhJy2RAD+zLDTL09tJIaJAS36GewwjrrSL+vk9NYEgLAjm1FBkvq4im1+jbXJOrv5f KAz4cMct6emLofj2wqRFEL8Qt31E/o6Euyo3XPTTewc9te0DFlxLZlb2BPcEvuGG5y++ wKjWHfPDNOUa7TKKMwCJYNV7eUsayMq1KZpfyKO0gNAhPVbJuEjSR8JWZfVjnGeMV/xf ZQrdTXdAXn6xJ0PMLju/jATPcericMf2kbzhxya4j7abQhekO+LmlGYsAuWJaeZ5TjFV aylvn0key6ZbCXYYYc2YT+zRPqrKR0mpRdSOlhUUCilTD158ZKzU2LB0NRzve/IyaFp2 ic4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lIgPZdDYglNtveCrJ4uIVyG3rPZ/NPd0tJczY4on4PA=; b=Ql11jx0N8oETgYKsSewTBrDyzLPq6pbUcAVFGFYGE3C7UYtnFot/+ksfTzI7L+GRXw NxkUcqTg/pr/f4vunpMVcusKSFk/jCpqRvy3jO3PBgwAgHFQotHOXi4CmyiJA7WkcMrM x828SSRYpC+sQ7lOqIGnGlzMssj6rs/PavGIOmJRJ6zVjPJgW3kKx1XMir3yVQpuHiVx TYTF2NMZbXLfERTcyMqFM4enpQDAYqQ7moJlSRLhZ7Pxw7AqUgPLjJBWqwQrzHPx8RJP oRhN+RmrtakZGrG1oGMrNeGNAe6y7dxbNeaz64DIan5QP7nvpU77is/cR08zc5ggv8qZ 2pbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lW8R53qAfhiz+RQDW5WcEMbD9keucidQtt1pFTwgK/Lvvhv8uYlugaOhGOUKZmZSzh42FzDbLBVwNMmA== X-Received: by 10.84.210.15 with SMTP id z15mr59097279plh.11.1489526052961; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:14:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.128.202 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:14:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1488743225-25750-1-git-send-email-rkerur@gmail.com> From: Ravi Kerur Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:14:12 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Mcnamara, John" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "Richardson, Bruce" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v4 0/3] Merge l3fwd-acl and l3fwd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:14:14 -0000 Hi John, Konstantin, On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Ravi Kerur wrote: > Hi John, > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Mcnamara, John > wrote: > >> > From: Ravi Kerur [mailto:rkerur@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 11:21 PM >> > To: Mcnamara, John >> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin ; >> > Richardson, Bruce >> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v4 0/3] Merge l3fwd-acl and l3fwd >> > >> > >> > Should I work with documentation team to update the document? If yes, >> > please let me know the contact information. >> >> Hi Ravi, >> >> There isn't any documentation team. Unfortunately. :-) >> >> The raw documentation is in text format and is generally updated by >> the developer submitting a patch. >> >> There is already docs for l3fwd and l3fwd_acl so all that is required >> is to merge them. However, you will need to take some care to remove >> the duplicate sections and to make sure that the merged doc makes >> sense as a whole. >> >> See the documentation guidelines: >> >> http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/documentation.html > > > Thanks. I realized after skimming through the documents and seeing a > 'doc:' prefix for review. Some clarifications on merging 'l3fwd' and > 'l3fwd-acl' > > 1. Instead of wholesale merger of both 'l3fwd' and 'l3fwd-acl', does it > make sense to > > a. Modify 'l3fwd' document by adding ACL processing information ('-A' > cmdline) and providing a link or reference to existing 'l3fwd-acl' > documentation since nothing has changed in terms of 'l3fwd-acl'. > > b. Add file read options for 'exact match' and 'longest prefix match' in > 'l3fwd' documentation. > Kindly let me know how you want me to proceed with the changes to documentation? Thanks. > > Thanks. > >> >> >> John >> > >