From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <itsolution@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43946107A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:33:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id m127so1086529wmm.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=4X6iYPKWjKAPmZniJKGrzDn19kgTAHp2/PVukUJ//wg=;
 b=haSo+VmtSF9SsrjyTdLERIZxBUhDns5ymyOFfdBUudguRmmdCH+R3US0gj9faiBdSn
 iikbLFWGlYGN5xs3HbezLBefODRN7HXoTjtlv/8nloNf1/rYXJmGHO+c5iZmQORvKub/
 9W6XK7QZUsyir1fpjkuYiaxANvo7wJuHYeUSU5vxOqN6dcoTdFtsWvuppyqXnC96jijC
 1ui+6HXBP60mHEra92aB3moRwe7+ImStksfweWs5lnVXizQVFL+UtJ0iOMUk6BiYIdkg
 yU7CzrRRDPmOu1EjRof+Y/aYe3azZmfilyRWxQVMlrFH+st9KIWv55nemJVbD3fwmCoK
 5Y8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=4X6iYPKWjKAPmZniJKGrzDn19kgTAHp2/PVukUJ//wg=;
 b=VwqMUTZQ27VqvNVV8+pxRfoxcOq4YoL15XRb/cFhyYUQ9vgD9t+fXysqrPaJTV/PyC
 L3Vb2qDHkn87X+fv/AkUxWxv7i5W/lLu/DaqoMIy+mJYzNMrEsAIoX9MP2J/A54EVmfr
 jOMK4vYDohTN+M4V8oU9Ji8psDIzi4VFvym/Md4+oJlZVMOn4o9v8cYRfpUK4n7HM4nl
 KmpIqI8S9A3JDW2a9RXcAksXVmFjt88+d9mqpemlmHCcf9RE6h1kHD8cGxeXa8ybuaiF
 4iMtBoK/SBxB55M6ppBSWWXNfKazunpSHKdrNuO1v/O8cMBN9T1Fgwb+exnpcLl4Bu8D
 3C9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiAI+fuwUaM27ukXkFBGA+25M4XXW5KPvRhO/bqlIdbVEyHCp4S
 rtuAPM7mFAPcbBlSVml7cpBr1p7xt7tglGpZD5CPzw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QARbNGSjGMp5/IuhlBqO/PrRpUWol3KIQZERYN5G/28ZX/6SPammUf+OC1wDeLMH0lj3enNE8l2uiCdqnAkaws=
X-Received: by 10.80.174.168 with SMTP id e37mr4266107edd.297.1506576810782;
 Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.192.30 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joo Kim <itsolution@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:33:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFj4wcJE6qJshm_WzuwxyUZQ9LzEksfgjuZRe9zmgSVo7abrXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] dpdk was compiled with CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_NUMA=n ,
 but on ovs-2.8 compilation, "configure: error: unable to find libnuma,
 install the dependency package "
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 05:33:31 -0000

Hello,


My dpdk was compiled with   CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_NUMA=n  (which is a
default in config/common_base).

But, I see following error when I  compile ovs-2.8 with dpdk enabled. Is
this expected?   Also ignorable error?

"
. . .
checking for library containing get_mempolicy... no
configure: error: unable to find libnuma, install the dependency package
"