From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com (mail-lf0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BCC4C79 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 04:33:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 37so11445505lfs.7 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 19:33:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MCIRr6GHlp1mcZKSL0RBAonVta0V3N9fQfrKiR8braM=; b=QZcKhqxFdMgmtI4J5xUnSkAbND2l/yrp+9v8BoYu5kom+wXW2wiw2EZKjI7/K4TwyA HZUAkrxh2THNB/HiIDKXijU0wa8aU2yco+MN/Xx6ShqERz+458BOWozj3nJXmGiYbNld 8sfCAtTtY/TdU20V0EVBaXx8IT3M1mF6R5unXHIQZIXVmknbZRByNpDU5gUvMBKLWjTh PGaHtPZXLMeUu6j3nD7QParhJN2TIb96RFJyzMTcm1pejdpvHb0r6sTc+Fj4+8KsYgxu GWCj0Hv4KX9aS7Zv+bko/bO0laxGIOJytnjyS8bVOQSrRnEi+2OQ7vIZd+3NFGELHRka WQOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MCIRr6GHlp1mcZKSL0RBAonVta0V3N9fQfrKiR8braM=; b=fPtMH8l1QLi+WwllP2hUfe4y6InKwkOA6XE6AyOeHN4+vXzdqYnfZbL0srIIyYDUtU WCqEWsCuKJHuorGpO1IilggS/q+eGYQLxhfAehyn7FMP5NTOhXZ9gQehL42Wt+iJA2f5 fb+uKTak5slLq0/8Fle1MskQtXNBPT0X3bz2BBrKSZzJW44txn1JcV8QfmT7UTMv8J90 O5xMcxd1N/bC8a4R1tf2OgMFjjmKx8jvlErt9hEr8MsWVEDf3E1cr1PvWOiU37zA238b VMmL7kam1J0167MernXwcrtRgZcZkZuEF560qy80OtncNcX/8DZkC4dL3o9NSA/4uwQr 346A== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GAfD6KEJE6AK2g/CE/Iwc2oefJUZ8lROijwFwI2TmqRf0KpaY5 BkG5lOxS39jAIHn3o45f/wRL2J15aQgsiB2FSDY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtJGg5Rs7lEFJEA7yuAXBdJl0YztCJKlsuXYOKWvOVdYXlIa+Mypiff+5baLliaas65QkGEiZtf8zaNelTX+18= X-Received: by 10.46.77.197 with SMTP id c66mr2972293ljd.116.1519961618520; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 19:33:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.196.139 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 19:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.196.139 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 19:33:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: James Huang Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 19:33:37 -0800 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?55yf5oiR6aOO6YeH?= <1534057243@qq.com> Cc: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [vlan offload] does I350 support vlan offload? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 03:33:39 -0000 I got same issue, is there any possible way to make it work? On Feb 3, 2018 5:26 PM, "=E7=9C=9F=E6=88=91=E9=A3=8E=E9=87=87" <1534057243@= qq.com> wrote: > Hi, All: > I want to use I350 vlan offload feature to impove performance, but > get in trouble. > After enable port_conf.hw_vlan_strip, i can get vlan id in > mbuf->vlan_tci, which indicate vlan rx offload is ok. > but when enable vlan tx offload as below steps, > a. set vlan id in mbuf->vlan_tci > b. set PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT in mbuf->ol_flags > then call rte_eth_tx_burst to transmit, and return value is greater than > 0(actually 1), but cannot dump pkt with vlan id > on opposite server. > > > So does I350 supports vlan tx offload? or my usage have error ? > > > Thanks!