From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <3chas3@gmail.com> Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com (mail-it0-f66.google.com [209.85.214.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BB81B1F1 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:15:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-it0-f66.google.com with SMTP id c195so1496622itb.1 for ; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 07:15:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=//OKF78kfnzqUbxZz2KOcy4/sagmOMlqrU1/KEXJlDg=; b=EDxHFeqpIl0bmEMzY81PL5x2Jc4Ko3OoUV7vS9Zey5XXkox8Am1mhTixUNazwOheDO Ne1ULY66WxZv0D/Drx+K2h04caRa8g+n9idDWEqt9Hrud6eY5C2nhlClkE85V6oZuWeZ XnN36UJc61b1rkfqWECgz0Gn3YGRdhKvp87lBriMHxKvhSAdARUixaQ9LTpSx9l159cm bopRHAcAj7OmUzKTQRCFbEDN+72E+MaEssI37R+wFFjI6+NAZEaOT5HKM2EbuaQ7gm0O sI7+VNU91msW/MBT5PUnNqPVl8bh0SpJvlZVYgDzFJwmU6DNyQW6m6ediKtzkRDbaXBT +WqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=//OKF78kfnzqUbxZz2KOcy4/sagmOMlqrU1/KEXJlDg=; b=HIquoauctMLbEV+PqVtYmys1L6uTjtpEx39SfIf5sjJxEJZH8TkMlguMNDsRNVYNQl YCA4OlEKTP1HpNCaQGlT0uN5t0svGUAUKJbFxG5gk+xCv+hI9uCCd7lK+Ui4mkolJWvZ QOMT1Ujj9jVINTVI/sqVzDwZIwXJ0INN6lIhoeMxbq4ANoRzDzurSu9wN4IdiL4gRnuB zRg+oqreF0sRBmELEn1DKMB8ZrdTwd4ID4m/U6drjpMYjcFr+S3/iyeSbSenyp8U30yp Wpx9DdvrPxmfSdWhSnevxc0XcKKWY/o/q0bD9if0t2ML1JCngBaKtMVE14AYvV7ABjGi JhzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiDBJVYMGr6wvWxsu1nB8eMqTYBRMFzQoUpfGPt/8Kwwoy0L302 0k73CXKmeEHR+FOl761F8ZITm55qZfcU31G8Z2dMoA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QD2pbG5ZYsGwlB7FhgMWFZMLxvR4bvhk3fidaGBF4yVE62ivCrT8CfM9NxOvaVI7SFylLUSr+tlycIcIWy27YE= X-Received: by 10.36.103.129 with SMTP id u123mr30314896itc.42.1507212909785; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 07:15:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: chasmosaurus@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: chasmosaurus@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.16.29 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 07:15:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0b7b3864-7594-5737-8f23-8dd8420a1c54@intel.com> References: <20170919212131.7006-1-3chas3@gmail.com> <20170919214545.7549-1-3chas3@gmail.com> <0b7b3864-7594-5737-8f23-8dd8420a1c54@intel.com> From: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:15:09 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TUNF4tmhmIUbB2N1CLDjqcwDdHw Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "John W. Linville" , "Charles (Chas) Williams" , Chas Williams Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/af_packet: make bypass configurable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:15:10 -0000 On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 9/19/2017 10:45 PM, Chas Williams wrote: > > From: "Charles (Chas) Williams" > > > > In certain situations, low speed interfaces, it may be desirable to > > have the flow control provided by the kernel queueing disciplines. > > Out of curiosity, do you have any compression of performance numbers > with and without qdisc? > I had some time to test this. I didn't see any loss in performance but the interfaces I am using only go about 200-300Mbps. it likely makes a difference if you can go much much faster.