From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <3chas3@gmail.com> Received: from mail-it0-f49.google.com (mail-it0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A832BB5 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:01:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-it0-f49.google.com with SMTP id c16so766920itc.5 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 05:01:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ih5EeWAzlCuTkkVXXbIAKHa0O79wMZdU9fSQxKjwjew=; b=tTH+3P+3HuqOkfBCR5oHn3sZACOLDO/VIo40lGKHe5IvTQOw+qGjNajPMF/bIxRcBV 3nNQrl/dxfDhDrS5mF/yxeLq6cKqX709BDz8EBgiuhSKSIcwMArrXWjYLAoWqBvCoKje fG97yMGRZqjOqAu6SJu52gg3nHH1o3MoY9u5IUZ+CZHd4+hvMK8oaGDpmVhiI8BTkHvH uTl1vUz29Jpve7VKDQXH/aM5d098LplzPrd26qjt4qY5Pxy5nmVB7MXhACNEGmOTXiHa 7WUNvPDOWy3CUhcaEPN+Fx1dN/4pY9z1ASxVwMSt2rTQqawENHT/kA65Ck1LzSD1YeXy z27A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ih5EeWAzlCuTkkVXXbIAKHa0O79wMZdU9fSQxKjwjew=; b=DFvf3dDcVwQvG6Mmte9zMHU0U6B0jPlSywEe7/bf9gkfebYdmMoot9niWTGWYxWHFO SfN5qAq6h1dJaWOD2E78Tgi/nAmdJfXRbDJNmE7QWQkhebbWNUajMjgPC+1GpywU+Jtd 4Vb7gfZNPDQWo6XFFZ4qfZ0WL9TpEsDXfQ+o4ImGg25u4Mu5tPSvMzI1tLCztPDshGr4 KOvBtRBGh+owGH5s0b8beoCy/MKjDqukK87WI5ljmDZwyjZVQk+/rz+BY1ZXW4Ri1cGy ctIQ9jfnypkPTLZzFB5OLOL93NlS9E5SgOXdqT7OOKtB3Qht1xKSr2w9xvAsV+Fhwf1y IMYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdXPYlZSNlxLYzEe41jHDgBujekxyDMmjujlDo5LuXVep7/GVyq WZ3Ti0tRFxQgWkm4CZFb0k8X+nd/dXPnNFqLkkE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBousD9PdoMs44Jacq6KMdZNxQon1NCTWij5ofS41IJ9rjk8VRs7CX5RHmp4IzQTTBA6mUsio2RqSKDJJv53C3MY= X-Received: by 10.36.237.200 with SMTP id r191mr14949905ith.70.1516021275073; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 05:01:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.69.9 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 05:01:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B7104FE@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20171206235528.29746-1-3chas3@gmail.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B70E3FC@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B7104FE@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 08:01:14 -0500 Message-ID: To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "skhare@vmware.com" , "Charles (Chas) Williams" , Chas Williams Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: add minimum support for Broadcom 54616 PHY X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:01:16 -0000 00:14.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection I354 [8086:1f41] (rev 03) I am not clear on the status of the document I have. Here is a link to a similar product: https://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/Bufs/AG6248.pdf -- I have the 7648c which is somewhat similar to the 6248c as far as the "out of band" ports. On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > Hi Chas, > > 1, Would you like to use this CLI =E2=80=9Clspci -nn | grep Eth=E2=80=9D = to get the device > ID of the NIC? > > 2, You mentioned =E2=80=9Cthe doc of the platform=E2=80=9D. Is it public?= If so, could you > tell me the link? Just want to understand more about it. > > Thanks. > > > > > > Best regards > > Wenzhuo Lu > > > > *From:* Chas Williams [mailto:3chas3@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January 12, 2018 1:57 AM > *To:* Lu, Wenzhuo > *Cc:* dev@dpdk.org; skhare@vmware.com; Charles (Chas) Williams < > ciwillia@brocade.com>; Chas Williams > *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: add minimum support for > Broadcom 54616 PHY > > > > I derived that value by observing what the ixgbe finds when loading on my > platform. The docs for the platform say that the attached PHY is a > Broadcom 54616. I couldn't find any documentation on this PHY to determi= ne > what this value is (i.e. is it really some sort of ID string for that > PHY). I almost suspect that the ixgbe is reading some registers on the > PHY that just happen to contain this value after reset. > > > > Supposedly it's similar to the 54618 but that really doesn't provide much > more information. The bnx2x has a driver for the 54618 and nothing that > looks similar to that string. >