From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gal.sagie@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com (mail-la0-f41.google.com
 [209.85.215.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E496A95EE
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 16:55:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id hv19so8155495lab.28
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 07:55:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=eIscB5cOgR/R9dTShApZXzH/a9ScXB4P76EOr2xhk6Q=;
 b=JnkPERkEMUtWatSiHxvDNzu6ceMk0v0uwqnhtkzxLi042Sipj32YUsctMp4pkIYLVc
 zTMf2jdUtKPnnDnbHb9tUH7ZgEqwg79jyfVut4vjLHcB043lZHEC6Dul4F0rTSckteSz
 ubLowBzCbS1em7ju+CH1mPwwfcfqRIYME+Sm/veaou+ifc+texAZ8OO5ieWcwuzu9Ps8
 gbIH2Stf7PT/3Fj1MLvvUQvETuc9f+9Qywl1qpPjcCQ3m1u9zCDYP6JTUL9Ejbgtw6Hg
 70Z5emddX4e2L4zeLpiUp3Va/pdZDzSm1asGiC/yd6u0kbx9n2UV7sAlV/0sMrwROPE9
 EX3A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.62.226 with SMTP id b2mr39652367lbs.44.1419522946498;
 Thu, 25 Dec 2014 07:55:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.129.3 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 07:55:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 17:55:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG9LJa6NwGVsJ0rZg1dVfha1c0y1p5QJpyumzG0=Poi03ZMrkg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gal Sagie <gal.sagie@gmail.com>
To: "<dev@dpdk.org>" <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] TSO with chained imbues
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 15:55:47 -0000

Hello all,

Does the TSO offload option works for chained mbufs?
What i mean is, if i have a chain representing a big TCP buffer, and i only
set the first mbuf with
TSO flags and tso_segsz (mss) and L4 size, will that work ? (or only
applied on the first mbuf)

I think that ideally this should work, just like for example, Jumbo frames
are being
splitted into chained mbuf's (other direction)

Thanks
Gal.