From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com (mail-oi0-f66.google.com [209.85.218.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D05C7CCD; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:07:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi0-f66.google.com with SMTP id h4so10011605oib.0; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 22:07:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+ObuCOtv2vlDuhXXfCcuqQkJsK3Jfzst6J3vkk1PVj8=; b=M8y05NXnZZ1mQvrFIZT+nziiChc8jqZ4hJ29GsuxeZXWJcROp9nSBU+LmQaetDTpt0 ZH4IoxQNv/fRUWaSkZIyIyMDoBROjUVLunf5zCCqtGbzd2kKZ5XF0ms+0pXBpqInHHIW taBJhr/Le8EUkS7la6rSGk9UXFZRPmBmYP4BcT90Vcw1+Dk8QE1Q4xIOujFIzXHhrutr A09z4jIaMjOUPw7SU0C76lhGKIcPJcgCg+/MfD/FPe9AHCaMcui252pQ+n3RPMqpuIzc nz5YmvKPtYoRJtgvbAtERV/Ul2gwRtpsNV63wyT3QJoA9dlLXAk/GKG2j+R2h2d747lC os8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=+ObuCOtv2vlDuhXXfCcuqQkJsK3Jfzst6J3vkk1PVj8=; b=DnQsZ3tBc5Lcwyqx3OsU3WVEY/AkFnR9qhoJmL6caUq+qZLiE9gBfjWVM9p7qgvIuC 0WD+quzeZWAMET+K3uXi2KZh9HQsuvgJPfOmFgdRNjhucIDw/W6rHVWZ+2a9d1OmLALV Jp3S4pE6aHM6iEbjh5kof25qln53S6Hu5h2X/0qyIg7LxhfUqB7xZY7Rca9czIB3y+l+ JkQkctj7aN1VKyLcsbwdy+3wuSCMwoX+uYK1is0h6RoXPDTqZ394pdTMUcZL3YhgbsuE X7u5w+fhNTOYoc1eKcgmBa4LPBVVj0wjPYB1ou5+BakPsN4o5yO336SMiPilgYfgGZ8R bAqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDF9D1eeq3r7zbZZCkoRLvNGZ8rRUX3Xl8Akgsxugi9vCUOqDZJ Wx+UYC4cvx2ZtCEzBDoaFiLyWtwaiSI1 X-Received: by 10.157.26.21 with SMTP id a21mr3483965ote.238.1496380043287; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 22:07:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.141.129 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:07:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Shashikant Poonia Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:37:22 +0530 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ixgbe: link status for PF up/down is not updating using LSI DPDK16.11.1 Sample App X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 05:07:24 -0000 Hi all, Anybody got a chance to look into ? BTW, am using below two patches for VF reset on DPDK 16.11 http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/040287.html ::lib/librte_ether: support device reset http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/040290.html ::ixgbe: implement device reset on VF Having few queries based above patches. 1) Are above patches are sufficient to reset VF ? Along with 2 patches, do we need to have more fix ? 2) May know, Why above patches are not submitted, Were there any side effect of both patches ? 3) Is the patch applicable to DPDK 2.1 also along with mailbox process patch ? 4) Is there any plan to submit above fixes in latest dpdk code ? Awaiting for the reply .. Thanks in advance. On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Shashikant Poonia < shashikantpoonia89@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > > I am running Link Status Interrupt(LSI) DPDK sample application to test > link status by making PF up/down using 'ip link set dev > up/down'. I would think, it should trigger 'ixgbe_dev_interrupt_handler()' > when we do interface up/down. But looks like it is not triggered > 'ixgbe_dev_interrupt_handler()' to update link status. > > > setup details: > > DPDK 16.11.1 LSI sample application > Host: rhel 7.2 having Intel X540 10G card > Guest: KVM hypervisor attached VFs > > Execute LSI binary on Guest using > ./link_status_interrupt -c 2 -n 4 -- -q 2 -p 0x3 > > My main goal to check the link status of VF's on Guest machine, but looks > like its not updated on PF itself. So once this works then i hope it works > for VF as well > > Please do let me know, whether i am missing any configuraion/patch ? Any > help would be appreciated > > > > -- > Regards, > Shashikant Poonia > -- Regards, Shashikant Poonia