DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shyam Shrivastav <shrivastav.shyam@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Shyam Shrivastav <shrivastav.shyam@gmail.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] ip_pipeline firewall customization
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 21:24:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGSp03m0rBbo_SVzeWxJFGCOTSTRFoEuxw6Ync5degEjHERb4w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi All

I am using ip_pipeline firewall as base for our project, need
comments/suggestions/corrections regarding following

1) We can not configure firewall  rule to drop packets, as portid is
mandatory in command. I am planning to allow this for our requirement with
following code changes
      a) Allow "port" as optional parameter (pipeline_firewall.c), pass -1
as port id if "port" is not specified to app_pipeline_firewall_add_rule and
change that parameter to int32_t.
      b) Make required changes in pipeline_firewall_msg_req_add_handler if
portid is -1, that is table entry action to be .action =
RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_DROP.

2) I am registering a f_action_hit function for firewall table to perform
certain translations if action is pass (RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT).
Configured a rule like following

pipeline>p 1 firewall add priority 1 ipv4 0.0.0.0 0 0.0.0.0 0 0 65535 0
65535 0 0 port 0

which should be hit only by ipv4 packets. However even ARP packets are hit
by this ACL and my routine is called. If I configure a specific src or dst
ip then everything works fine and arp packets are not hit , for example
following rule hits only ipv4 icmp packets

pipeline>  p 1 firewall add priority 1 ipv4 0.0.0.0 0 45.35.70.12 32 0
65535 0 65535 1 0xf port 0

Is this a bug or am I missing something ?


Thanks
Shyam

             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-08 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-08 15:54 Shyam Shrivastav [this message]
2017-03-09 10:06 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-03-09 11:43   ` Shyam Shrivastav
2017-03-09 13:50     ` Shyam Shrivastav
2017-03-09 22:07       ` Singh, Jasvinder
2017-03-10  5:30         ` Shyam Shrivastav

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGSp03m0rBbo_SVzeWxJFGCOTSTRFoEuxw6Ync5degEjHERb4w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shrivastav.shyam@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).