From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com (mail-lb0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F1C376C for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:39:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lbbzk7 with SMTP id zk7so184113lbb.0 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 01:39:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=h3brLnKxCT9dlpKs/I4FQu2VI9ys3zsBvdhFCrbnG1g=; b=tDHOMCAlgzEyfKadLcBXnT51OZdQT8SwqCrROj9UyI0XVrngvx7svtwRb96VxivNkp qO2+wus8OKfJQGvabK8fH+BL/i6e3nK2OcPHXyTH5m6DbAHkYwbULvEl0xGlZ8MJAYN/ XXT3P6bb1xGMJ7CJfC28Zj7YqI8+AkBFtDZaSGZNqfTizXtJWt/MIYk7LqB1YO0qKnrC kmh5pAC89xmR38T/xZcJiGQ0aNWVHQBkPRQpHuPnQFPl8SuizqGPQKMk0P1IucLJJTJM KHUyE0sB6zwr/ujaGXQkCn+al8xgMEGb2vhtPSSPw/yvXFDJbpf9Vofq/iVG59/0sWcg KFBA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.140.231 with SMTP id rj7mr10890929lbb.76.1431419941762; Tue, 12 May 2015 01:39:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.206.146 with HTTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 01:39:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:09:01 +0530 Message-ID: From: Shankari Vaidyalingam To: "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Query: Netperf with DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 08:39:02 -0000 Hi I'm using netperf to check the performance and throughput of the DPDK application that I'd developed. For testing the above I need to run netperf on the DPDK bound interface. But I'm not able to find the correct option for running the netperf on the DPDK bound interface as the interface is no longer in kernel mode (it doesnt have an IP address) Can you let me know which option I can use/any alternative available for running netperf on the DPDK interface (specifying the MAC address of the DPDK interface). Regards Shankari.V