From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com (mail-lf0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF142C6E for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 19:32:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id s64so51902262lfe.0 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 10:32:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=JzxToXlb8XN14yXuxFnF6l5xuggV0ZSeMJAiV4qdWdU=; b=Exq5vBnRu7JD/rb7Yx+UCS9TUzwy3cz9oHB+iukPRiPnNz/jEJNABUgWrc7BITpyNL ZTRaClLxHWlD0UjPwdBtZjvO6N25XnIH1tkSwr9VyL/CVfCCWFNR8DqIb5CEhTR6wR/a FtTlj4GfjBIJinxMsqXv9C4hHydk1Rw0gNDClC06EsYXM0+GK5R8gPIwHcGjgf++B8cF E4TLxkocA/jL4yATkxb02lMoDiqHK/SQ7tJHZIXjBcCnm+lM5Jn+ucAOebUQr1vjPcLL ZxNJhfuAOXCU+O1yUJe2VTno1Oim/D9igtCy3edhArPAIw0yPHc5f0xEyVV5e1r41XVP qOiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=JzxToXlb8XN14yXuxFnF6l5xuggV0ZSeMJAiV4qdWdU=; b=W8Tz1NHT4gu4rfbG+b+X54hwoQyzabQxPXfi6PzQ2cRAVPCUEtpfcP1yT7bBcjgLSf 5SMbFTDWiWvcbPeQn1eHm/UclcAG76xFPVhBcmssczg160b2deWSEbKZSuS0OGQ9viC7 Qpik+5OZt/WSetc31j0oRx/bvUGM9ERlbAUjGJ3rbyT18WUrzL5GphGfRJkNCFgBg/wD tth8lnpKmffEVFXISsGz0bnWBUFHJ5dNnNjKCJolqUtqHjn2mki9nrz62tUdCS8QVBiK ylaCyP3wGGy72hFMB3/MDhSXyTAE8rnPaQtHjQds6/Bcrla3v5GxT6drUT7qrLttKXwe 2lDA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJh/DnR2aVcTTXu8GLh19ybV+9bSQk0woTTPBCYuQcP3LOR9WezhwWAa/m+boXBYkCJz++yBeidhEqmhQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.27.196 with SMTP id b187mr7885932lfb.218.1464629540599; Mon, 30 May 2016 10:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.27.71 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2016 10:32:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <63E2EB50-3D10-4652-99D0-1026D67E7B14@intel.com> References: <63E2EB50-3D10-4652-99D0-1026D67E7B14@intel.com> Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 23:02:20 +0530 Message-ID: From: shiva m To: "Wiles, Keith" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_pmd_init_all is missing while upgrading from DPDK 1.6 to DPDK 1.7 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 17:32:21 -0000 Hi, Thank you very much for your replies. I removed this API, I also see rte_eal_pci_set_blacklist() is no more available with DPDK 1.7.1, I am using rte_eal_devargs_add(). Any document mentioning changes from DPDK-1.6 to DPDK-1.7? Thanks, Shiva On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote: > The PMD=E2=80=99s are now being inited in the EAL init call for the code = and that > API is not required anymore. If you are adding a new driver, make sure it > is up to date with any changes in the driver code too. > > Regards, > Keith > > > > >Hi, > > > >I have rte_pmd_init_all used in my code. While upgrading from DPDK 1.6 t= o > >DPDK 1.7, I see this function is missing in DPDK 1.7. I > >removed rte_pmd_init_all from my code, but I am not sure whether > >initialization is done for all poll mode drivers > > > >What is the right way to do this?. Can anyone please help in this. > > > >Thanks, > >Shiva > > > > > >