From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55049A04F3;
	Thu,  2 Jan 2020 18:11:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D311C13A;
	Thu,  2 Jan 2020 18:11:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com (mail-wm1-f45.google.com
 [209.85.128.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4A31C12E;
 Thu,  2 Jan 2020 18:11:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id p17so6310313wmb.0;
 Thu, 02 Jan 2020 09:11:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=J0Kw8ehqftV+A0Wkx6iYZcIBpptcF2xzXs6CXqT6X5Q=;
 b=ZUyEc1xOeIjIg1relP1DtyX9G/hPYf4y1rIEzAqvjRdYRNWbHJHmv02xyQK+MAwGe+
 BZ9/1EqFuABspfu88uVfJbJrZSd02r0I7P3BZ6NqBPnvyMSb6UerpO0JdiJiRZsOFM3i
 QGXn9HqyQgZE2Fp/em8JHf3T6gvOYg5X4t6yLY3YmNdd2J3pywtlskO7PdyAwQ39+EUX
 C/z9GbIT6jjFniIGa5LwdqbgSsfKsLDF+HStFUQ9X1SSf1JySYK9v83x+lX2bkTQGcRV
 IBu+rdONySqAfvf/9q6+u38qEgQLIfwvlOUzm785p+Jgz4ghnfTeHMraK/wCA/kklhFV
 0gyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=J0Kw8ehqftV+A0Wkx6iYZcIBpptcF2xzXs6CXqT6X5Q=;
 b=m/W91VXCV+vefIUupDkAHuSd9QGDLoIpiAT9XeDvw2KTieCMjdnsoUTFJuihIV3SHR
 fGnb9ZZfQpSofbOSExFzngYx7FozTRzv2aTGrzWtIJtsk5RAuZjWzj7p3Y+F9+Y+DU7x
 cu9pmkpPboVPgVM+XpmZbIZQ2UP8MA4r2iRpW1OdAM9WMm4TSNsg/vxi+cyg0C0Xwd03
 8SCSm/9ikOGRBx1EzDrDhoWJtsZqQ1mgVzT8qPknFMmEwD8cytaESiYfYrYDMe3Jv3y9
 0KFXWv7yEFICYx6MnntL65uYtYgYIjPYLX9qi6/ZaPi8fSOeU54e/nDLCRW2FC/1zlvu
 rrwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWiQrFSgsckZ8npUEHcO515iM//rsjWLKD8Ql5SuCsrFQLaU+a1
 heWyqCrzRo552VaDsJH2kLOW1uwbbCZBPeVY9dA8FuVd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw7cya1E7/125dt3F0sPcKYooCL4IHQCWl4NTfYmYkfP00De6Zk1/ERUGAqYHZJSOgCd2/Fp9Dbb6WTCJ/AtI0=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c38c:: with SMTP id s12mr15184401wmj.96.1577985078721; 
 Thu, 02 Jan 2020 09:11:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tarun Anand <anandtarun2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:41:07 +0530
Message-ID: <CAGwKEEkfakWM+Akea2jvXv=4r-Tt3x7JSFW8Pjz_YueyhmGkZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: "Mohit P. Tahiliani" <tahiliani@nitk.edu.in>,
 Archit Pandey <architpandeynitk@gmail.com>, 
 Sanjana Krishnam <sanjana.krishnam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Testing the working of QoS with RED AQM enabled vs RED
	AQM disabled
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Our goal is to understand the how the DPDK QoS Framework works. In order to
understand its functioning, we ran the sample QoS application. Additionally
, we want to test how it works with and without the RED AQM enabled.
Despite two different configurations - one with RED enabled and the other
without RED enabled, we obtain very similar queue length results. We would
like to know what setup is  required to test the two scenarios .