From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com (mail-wr1-f65.google.com [209.85.221.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3DF91 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 19:24:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id o15-v6so6983081wrv.4 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 10:24:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RMATcfpSsSJLdHSaNo1ucSBGJIUeh6vLniWHuZCRxjo=; b=B74ROgbp1VgVzHJ1l3tgaysmTSAey/eIjasc+WTuazftnUGQgVaw5a44+HFS7CRF9d lEUI7wKjFxIv1p2t8+Wtm/mq8fiG9JwV0vKO+JoVe7U1puvoLE2oDNi/0y6lh2GBGEA+ 53N+biBwhNAewW0+8kceS6eYWIMqZ2HbJm8VP2L9026OYidYfniBKar7zeVU1hI4H+js 2hDgGMMHjrfCVQgO+4M9IqVdoJcb2J6544fC8eq37xIFk7bHC5XYtjyApNbVLsr10W6N Bkb9vI6rs6oafdRo3bXG1iUR6nvcRB7vEWQMaMFTZuiM4Lz1HDA6ayeqOKhTWZnNL/pQ wdrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gI1PcyePckO5zCsG0zp/rz+GHthbFQTy+lgyxdkPMqZiRsOhhgY ifS79WNg9YBaL72/pFcYGIvA3N1boafU2ddmvO+O5eh0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cWUe1YIeuCw/vCJt/Q1R9aqxVbUKvlw7cCmGzlyQuS11Zi9REGgPZ2VzUIB/Yg+sr0JJ1TLqzPgRv11cHUMh8= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:618c:: with SMTP id j12-v6mr13467250wru.300.1541442264211; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 10:24:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181105172844.72228-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <5c66a386-ded9-4075-1a72-73d598e7910e@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5c66a386-ded9-4075-1a72-73d598e7910e@intel.com> From: Dan Gora Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:23:48 -0200 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update release notes for default KNI carries status X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 18:24:25 -0000 On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 4:21 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > There is no test plan documentation within dpdk repo. There is DTS (dpdk test > suit) in a separate repo [1], which needs to be updated, and indeed this patch > is to point them the change because existing test is failing after changes... > > [1] > https://git.dpdk.org/tools/dts/ Should patches for the DTS get sent to this list (dev@dpdk.org) as well or is there are separate list for those?