[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] small fixes for vdev hotplug

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] small fixes for vdev hotplug

[Thomas Monjalon]

These are 2 small fixes.

A bigger cleanup may be needed in vdev:
rte_vdev_init() can be replaced by rte_dev_probe().
Any volunteer? Note: vdev has no maintainer.


Raslan Darawsheh (1):
  bus/vdev: fix hotplug twice

Thomas Monjalon (1):
  bus/vdev: fix debug message on probing

 drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] bus/vdev: fix debug message on probing

[Thomas Monjalon]

The log was printing the device name two times,
first one being supposed to be the driver name.
As we don't know yet the driver name, the log is simplified.

Fixes: 9bf4901d1a11 ("bus/vdev: remove probe with driver name option")
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
---
 drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
index 2c03ca4185..7225411791 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
@@ -144,9 +144,7 @@ vdev_probe_all_drivers(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
 	int ret;
 
 	name = rte_vdev_device_name(dev);
-
-	VDEV_LOG(DEBUG, "Search driver %s to probe device %s", name,
-		rte_vdev_device_name(dev));
+	VDEV_LOG(DEBUG, "Search driver to probe device %s", name);
 
 	if (vdev_parse(name, &driver))
 		return -1;
-- 
2.20.1

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] bus/vdev: fix hotplug twice

[Thomas Monjalon]

From: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>

In case vdev was already probed, it shouldn't be probed again,
and it should return -EEXIST as error.
There are some checks in vdev_probe() and insert_vdev(),
but a check was missing in vdev_plug().
The check is moved in vdev_probe_all_drivers() which is called
in all code paths.

Fixes: e9d159c3d534 ("eal: allow probing a device again")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
---
 drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
index 7225411791..87f0e2b6bb 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ vdev_probe_all_drivers(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
 	struct rte_vdev_driver *driver;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (rte_dev_is_probed(&dev->device))
+		return -EEXIST;
+
 	name = rte_vdev_device_name(dev);
 	VDEV_LOG(DEBUG, "Search driver to probe device %s", name);
 
@@ -480,7 +483,7 @@ static int
 vdev_probe(void)
 {
 	struct rte_vdev_device *dev;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int r, ret = 0;
 
 	/* call the init function for each virtual device */
 	TAILQ_FOREACH(dev, &vdev_device_list, next) {
@@ -489,10 +492,10 @@ vdev_probe(void)
 		 * we call each driver probe.
 		 */
 
-		if (rte_dev_is_probed(&dev->device))
-			continue;
-
-		if (vdev_probe_all_drivers(dev)) {
+		r = vdev_probe_all_drivers(dev);
+		if (r != 0) {
+			if (r == -EEXIST)
+				continue;
 			VDEV_LOG(ERR, "failed to initialize %s device",
 				rte_vdev_device_name(dev));
 			ret = -1;
-- 
2.20.1

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] bus/vdev: fix debug message on probing

[Rami Rosen]

Reviewed-by: Rami Rosen <ramirose@gmail.com>

בתאריך יום ה׳, 21 בפבר׳ 2019, 21:01, מאת Thomas Monjalon ‏<
thomas@monjalon.net>:

> The log was printing the device name two times,
> first one being supposed to be the driver name.
> As we don't know yet the driver name, the log is simplified.
>
> Fixes: 9bf4901d1a11 ("bus/vdev: remove probe with driver name option")
> Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
> index 2c03ca4185..7225411791 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
> @@ -144,9 +144,7 @@ vdev_probe_all_drivers(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
>         int ret;
>
>         name = rte_vdev_device_name(dev);
> -
> -       VDEV_LOG(DEBUG, "Search driver %s to probe device %s", name,
> -               rte_vdev_device_name(dev));
> +       VDEV_LOG(DEBUG, "Search driver to probe device %s", name);
>
>         if (vdev_parse(name, &driver))
>                 return -1;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] bus/vdev: fix debug message on probing

[Andrew Rybchenko]

On 2/21/19 10:01 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The log was printing the device name two times,
> first one being supposed to be the driver name.
> As we don't know yet the driver name, the log is simplified.
>
> Fixes: 9bf4901d1a11 ("bus/vdev: remove probe with driver name option")
> Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] bus/vdev: fix hotplug twice

[Andrew Rybchenko]

On 2/21/19 10:01 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> From: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>
>
> In case vdev was already probed, it shouldn't be probed again,
> and it should return -EEXIST as error.
> There are some checks in vdev_probe() and insert_vdev(),
> but a check was missing in vdev_plug().
> The check is moved in vdev_probe_all_drivers() which is called
> in all code paths.
>
> Fixes: e9d159c3d534 ("eal: allow probing a device again")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] small fixes for vdev hotplug

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 2/21/2019 7:01 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> These are 2 small fixes.
> 
> A bigger cleanup may be needed in vdev:
> rte_vdev_init() can be replaced by rte_dev_probe().
> Any volunteer? Note: vdev has no maintainer.
> 
> 
> Raslan Darawsheh (1):
>   bus/vdev: fix hotplug twice
> 
> Thomas Monjalon (1):
>   bus/vdev: fix debug message on probing

Series applied, thanks.