DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jigsaw <jigsaw@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 82599 feature request: loopback and TSO
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:56:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHVfvh4=nT=O3xFWg0VuGZWPFu=eF8WR3Ma0O6F3YZoLp=RTsw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201309231042.29116.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for reply. Hereunder the patch for Tx->Rx loopback operation for
82599. Note that Rx->Tx is not implemented yet.
The patch is tested with a Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit KX4 Network
Connection.
If the patch could be accepted then Rx->Tx could be implemented on top of
it.

https://gist.github.com/jigsawecho/6671630


On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> 22/09/2013 20:01, jigsaw :
> > Is there any plan for adding support for 82599 features such as:
> >
> > 1. Loopback operation for diagnostic purpose
> > The Tx->Rx loopback operation is handy when debugging with a standalone
> 10G
> > port.
> >
> > 2. TCP/UDP segmentation in Tx (TSE bit in DCMD)
> > TSO implementation is already in kernel. Is it in the roadmap of DPDK?
>
> I'll reword your question to "Is there anybody who is willing to
> send patches for these features ?"
>
> Note that a patch from Ivan Boule (6WIND) has already been integrated to
> provide capabilities of the devices:
>         "ethdev: add support for device offload capabilities"
>
> --
> Thomas
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-23 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-23  8:42 Thomas Monjalon
2013-09-23 14:56 ` jigsaw [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-22 18:01 jigsaw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHVfvh4=nT=O3xFWg0VuGZWPFu=eF8WR3Ma0O6F3YZoLp=RTsw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jigsaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).