From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <jigsaw@gmail.com> Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786F8595B for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:14:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id y19so862002wgg.15 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:24:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ljkN/wkEqqtOeNNQcdhdv4dzNuFFT67/UCstUMfVtKw=; b=WLlGi7oKytzHAd/EjLBMuP7IiprONxBsd1O1YuOB40Q7Nom366tdDbyCHmNtRsi04m 6D7ByV5IK7No7Ehux3XWTAajVzUE8LA9pqlNwQpOwhVJGrWqx+PCMxdpuwAY9juHgGGn xK+xEut0bAE1s19ZpM9CmBnLJ2y8zd7RcSEUqY3XDxOzURUO5AM/vuF5q/tKXVmEr3Pt gp9/waKMwhmOIL1q1tT0THZKEW/ReN2HOvnbmriVEtRfEOrBsZ1AJg8rWW8osEBWES4c 708iHEN3cjA2jEgguKcThSxdGtDi3CHRL176YoWnPIKwd0rQ1HYod8uoKhLF5iNUhEwS CkNA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.63.79 with SMTP id e15mr1914194wjs.79.1415870659463; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:24:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.86.14 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:24:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1790564.eeil24UKmd@xps13> References: <1415630642-3905-1-git-send-email-jigsaw@gmail.com> <1795062.hHiWS5oXJV@xps13> <CAHVfvh6zLy8pGyuWw5QTKowxoZWgSH2-TpOYEVO-RXqsM9-rdQ@mail.gmail.com> <1790564.eeil24UKmd@xps13> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:24:19 +0200 Message-ID: <CAHVfvh7G7MYC+V_aQZzzWhbjJYyDnvToB0qcf3SyfjMk_oVy2A@mail.gmail.com> From: jigsaw <jigsaw@gmail.com> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] Add in_flight_bitmask so as to use full 32 bits of tag. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:14:21 -0000 OK thanks. Sorry my bad. -ql On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com > wrote: > 2014-11-13 08:56, jigsaw: > > >>Do you have another commit before this one in your tree? > > > > Yes this patch relies on this one: > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007943.html > > > > Sorry I didn't make it clear. The new field usr in rte_mbuf was under > same > > cover letter in v2 of the in_flight_bitmask patch. > > Then in_flight_bitmask has a v3 patch, but I didn't include the rte_mbuf > in > > the same cover letter, coz the usr patch has been ACKed. > > OK. In this case, you should re-submit the whole serie and add the acked-by > line in the patch, and/or use the --in-reply-to option to place the v3 > patch in > the original thread. > > No need to resend it, I can manage to get the whole patchset now. > > Thanks > -- > Thomas >